What exactly is your point?
Do you think I'm being unfair to him or something. His next contract will begin at age 33. How many players maintain their play post that age, the answer is very few. The simple fact of the matter is that there is a hih probability that he will not be worth his next contract. Imo it is reasonable for the team to hedge against this be going short term. There is precedence to this if you look at how the Sharks have handled their aging star forwards.
3 years at 7.5 per is still compensating him handsomely for years he will still be a key component. Not sure what insulting about that. The team always has the option of extending him after if he's still effective at age 37.
This team finished 2nd in the league and is playing in the Conference Finals right now. Yet you suggest
trading Wheeler if he doesn't agree to extend on certain terms. That's insane.
There is a debate to be had about what the contract details for a Wheeler extension should or should not look like, and your opinion on that is definitely reasonable. But in no way should a 114-point conference finalist trade their 90-point captain over a contract disagreement. We're going to have a good chance to win the cup next year, with three key forwards on very cheap contracts for what they bring. That's not a chance you piss away.
There is a time for a franchise when it should be a priority to replace older players with younger players and avoid contracts that could hurt 3-5 years down the line. That time for the Jets was when they consistently finished out of the playoffs. Now is not the time. Now the #1 priority is to win the cup by constructing the best roster you possibly can. Don't trade very good UFA-to-bes just to "recoup" some "value" (magic beans).