Seems like you aren't happy with his assessment, especially of the d prospects. That doesn't make him wrong.
It wasn't meant to be a comprehensive analysis of every prospect on the team's depth chart. He identified the biggest names, and his point still stands. Even the article posted by our own HF writer makes it look like Oleksiak and Nemeth are still uncertain question marks, and those are the two prime D prospects who are supposed to provide the most immediate help.If I were writing an article about how terrible the team is and how weak the prospect pool is I would probably mention the Vances and Molins of the group as well. He cherry-picked names lower on the prospect totem pole to make his point. But sure, I'm unhappy because he disagrees with me.
It wasn't meant to be a comprehensive analysis of every prospect on the team's depth chart.
He identified the biggest names
I freely admit I haven't read his drivel but if I understand is he really bagging on two guys drafted in the 4th (Molin) and 5th round (Vance) as though the fact that they're not lighting it up as prospects a knock on the franchise? They're not done but anyone expecting anything from them or that Dallas failed to find another franchise player late in the draft is a moron.
No, that's not what he said.I freely admit I haven't read his drivel but if I understand is he really bagging on two guys drafted in the 4th (Molin) and 5th round (Vance) as though the fact that they're not lighting it up as prospects a knock on the franchise? They're not done but anyone expecting anything from them or that Dallas failed to find another franchise player late in the draft is a moron.