Not at all, that’s why I made a new thread and new hypothetical situation, in this situation the hit is perfectly legal. Is it still a penalty/suspension?
Obviously not. Why even ask the question? Legal clean hits happen every game and injuries less often but still do happen without penalties and certainly without suspensions.
This is like asking "if a player shoots a puck and it hits a goalie pad, should it be a shot on goal?"
I wanted the opinions of as many people as possible on the matter, how else would one go about getting that info without posting a new topic on the subject?
You could try paying attention when you watch hockey.
You're asking us a posited hypothetical that is just a reality of the game. Clean checks that are the result of the hit player's positioning and end in injuries don't result in penalties often, and when it happens, most fans recognize it as bad reffing. Most fans of the game understand injuries happen.
Edit: but let's call a spade a spade. This is a thinly veiled attempt to further the narrative that Sundqvist should be admonished for cutting across the ice when he got hit instead of focusing on the illegality and reckless nature of Wilson's hit. Your body of work in the Wilson thread has said enough. You're not fooling anyone.