Big couple years for Riley. The hopes of second line center feel faded, but a strong defensive 3rd line center would be great.
It is impossible for him to have anything approaching as good of a shot to earn a larger role on the team than he's had between last year and this year.
If he can't get a larger role now, consider that ship forever sailed.
I think this is a great signing. A mediocre 2015-16 left a bad impression in a lot of people's mouths, but the whole team had reduced output. I still have faith in a low end 2C ceiling for Sheahan and still believe he was one of our most valuable guys the year before.
It is impossible for him to have anything approaching as good of a shot to earn a larger role on the team than he's had between last year and this year.
If he can't get a larger role now, consider that ship forever sailed.
And yet... Justin Abdelkader.
Eh, you could argue that. But then you step back and realize that there is, I think, a lot more decision making that goes into RFA signings. Future contracts, comparables, is a bridge the right deal to make? Or should we sign this kid up long term and hope for cheap. Klingberg's contract is good example. If they had gone bridge route, which would've been a reasonable way to go since realistically you would have no idea if he could repeat or improve off of that one NHL season. They would probably be regretting that right about now. Sky appears to be the limit with that kid, next contract would have him getting PAID. But they went long term, some people already consider his contract a steal.
To me though, you look at what most people here or at other sites and what they predict our RFAs will get and it typically comes in under most predictions. Think most people were saying Sheahan will get around 2.5mil. 500k isn't a number to scoff at, that money adds up. Thats why I think Holland does an excellent job when it comes to RFA signings.
And yet... Justin Abdelkader.
Abdelkader was a 12 minute night 4th line/2nd PK guy his first two and a half years, getting an IT bump in the second half of the shortened '13 season after the team went through a 5 game losing streak and the lines got shook up. Then he had a 2 goal and a 3 goal game and finished with 10 goals the last 30 or so games and then a couple more in the playoffs after that.
The next year was 2014, where the whole team was hurt the whole season, so he got a larger role and mostly underperformed in it.
Then 2015 rolled around and the team had very few top 6 options other than Abdelkader, so when he put up 20 he pretty much locked it in.
Sheahan's had pretty much the same chance Abdelkader's had. Probably a better one, given that he's lined up with better offensive players in his early career than Abdelkader had.
The primary difference between the two is that Abdelkader's got a more natural ability to score goals than Sheahan, and that's been the case since they both played college hockey. Don't get me wrong, they aren't renaming it the Justin Abdelkader Award for Goal Scoring or anything, but still.
Also, it doesn't hurt that Abdelkader will fight. It's becoming a lost art, but it's still marginally valuable to have someone who will thump the other guy if they run at your star.
Want to put money on that? Because betting against it will be the easiest money I ever make.I mean you're acting like Sheahan hasn't performed at all.. He produced at a 40 point pace his first two years in the league, which is what Abby has done the past 2 seasons during what is going to be considered the prime of his career. Sheahan is just more of a passer than a shooter. His production took a dip this year because he had less assists on a team where basically everyone struggled to score goals, but Sheahan has been a better player his first few years in the league than Abdelkader was...
Sheahan hasn't hit his prime yet in my opinion. I can see 50+ points at his peak if he can stay healthy, which isn't unreasonable given what he did his first two seasons.
And Riley definitely reminds me of Mule in several ways. A guy with all the tools but who seems to have a lack of drive/desire to make the most out of it.Franzen wasn't even in the league yet at Sheahan's age. Then it took him 2 years on the bottom 6 to get a bigger role.
And Riley definitely reminds me of Mule in several ways. A guy with all the tools but who seems to have a lack of drive/desire to make the most out of it.
If a player doesn't have 50 points by the time they're 24 it will never happen.
It is known.
Want to put money on that? Because betting against it will be the easiest money I ever make.
, I'm sorry but when a guy like Nick Foligno can put up 73 points I think Sheahan putting up 50 seems within the realm of possibility, I think it's more likely that he peaks in the low 40's or so but all it takes is one year where everything clicks, I think you're really underestimating his skill set.
Want to put money on that? Because betting against it will be the easiest money I ever make.
You also thought that Larkin wasn't gonna get near 50-60 in his 1st year
Not many did, there are about 10 NHL teams kicking themselves right now. Sheahan, on the other hand, has a long history of being an offensive black hole.