Penguinator
Kesselator
What do you mean by the bolded? Who is "the average Joe"? Most of my non-hockey friends refuse to watch hockey BECAUSE of the lack of scoring. So I don't think they'd be the type who'd care if bigger nets were introduced if the end result is more offense.
Personally, I'm just tired of people having a big fit whenever the topic of increasing net sizes is raised, yet they're perfectly fine with goalies having equipment ten times the size of previous generations. It just makes logical sense that as the equipment grows and takes up more of the net even with the goalie standing still, then the net should be increased at the same rate so that there's still as much net to shoot at as in the past.
Average Joe = common denominator by NHL standards. Listen, i'm all for bigger nets but i just don't think it'll happen with this league. You're also talking about changing an industry & the whole hockey world all the way down to pee-wee.
But yeah, i guess folks would easily get over it if it would end up increasing the entertainment factor but that's just too logical for the NHL & too costly for the goal manufacturing industry.
The incentives just don't seem to be worthwhile for the NHL as of now.