stampedingviking
Registered User
No, no, no.Canucks should be all over Burrows. Trade Vanek and another forward. Pickup Burrows.
No, no, no.Canucks should be all over Burrows. Trade Vanek and another forward. Pickup Burrows.
Depends if they want that number for next year, because he's pretty close to finished at an NHL player if he isn't alreadyCanucks should be all over Burrows. Trade Vanek and another forward. Pickup Burrows.
Uhh, doesn't this mean they're clearing space for the incoming players from a Karlsson trade?
Better than two seasons.So Ottawa basically traded Dahlén for a season of Burrows? Wow!
Both are finished at this level, although you'd think someone would give atleast a 7th for Oduya as a 6/7.
This is coming from a coyotes fan? Lol no team comes close to Arizona in terms of sad franchises. You guys got bailed out by the NHL how many times now?I am happy I am not a Sens fan. 1 year ago your a buyer, make the East finals. Start of this year your make a weird trade to acquire Duchene and not extend Turris for same salary as Duchene....
Then owner complains about arena, team stumbles and now you are going to trade your captain and start tearing down the team.
What a roller coaster of a calendar season in the nations capital I tell ya!!
It is when you're trying to fool the fan base into believing "rebuilding on the fly" actually works.If the Canucks were ******* smart: they would trade Vanek, Hutton/Edler, and a *** ton more people, and just fill the spots with waiver fodder and prospects while picking up assets. Like holy **** rebuilding the right way isn’t difficult.