darko
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2009
- 70,269
- 7,797
Padres about to acquire Darvish.
Lamet, Yu, Snell, Paddack and Davies. Wooow.
Still have Gore.
Padres about to acquire Darvish.
Lamet, Yu, Snell, Paddack and Davies. Wooow.
These two starters could have been retained for $ 25m. That's less than several teams pay one starter.At least Snell won't have to worry about being pulled after five innings lol
My goodness Tampa napalmed their two best starters, talk about doubling down on the whole opener approach.
Tampa is a cheap pissant organization like Milwaukee.Snell's track record is a bit inconsistent, but on a very high level. The Padres wanted a pitcher with TOR potential and they got one.
If we project Snell to produce 10 WAR over the next three years minus his total salary of $ 30m (which might be even on the lower side), there is an excess value of $ 50m. Patino alone might very well top that, but he is still rather unproven. The Padres' window of contention is wide open now, so they just could not wait on Patino. I see why Preller made this trade.
After the Rays refused to retain Morton, it is at least consequential to sell high on Snell. Although this franchise develops very good players at an amazing rate and has a lot of top prospects still in stock, I think Tampa Bay will have to bite the bullet and stand to pay some players 8-figure salaries eventually, if they want to play in the WS again. Patino is a highly praised prospect and his 3-pitch arsenal could be utilised even better through the Rays' hybrid pitching philosophy.
Gruß,
BSHH
its the rays. they always find a way to turn someone else's trash into treasure and stay competitive2 wins away from World Series win and Rays are selling?
What a disgraceful organization.
2 wins away from World Series win and Rays are selling?
What a disgraceful organization.
Is it really selling when the team will likely have a better win% than last year?
Plus, it's not like Cash would use Snell to his full potential, anyway.
I could be very wrong but I have a hard time believing that the Rays will have a better record next year after losing Snell AND Morton
Is it really selling when the team will likely have a better win% than last year?
Plus, it's not like Cash would use Snell to his full potential, anyway.
I could be very wrong but I have a hard time believing that the Rays will have a better record next year after losing Snell AND Morton
You guys are probably right, but I've looked past them way too often to do so now.I don't think they'll have a better win % but they are still a playoffs team.
2 wins away from World Series win and Rays are selling?
What a disgraceful organization.
It’s a matter of principle. What a disgrace. Spend some f***ing money.Its best not to question the Rays. Remember when people crapped on them for trading Archer? For trading Shields?
Rays have been selling their top guys for a long time, so this trade shouldn't come as a shock to anyone. They will still compete.
It’s a matter of principle. What a disgrace. Spend some f***ing money.
Then they shouldn't exist.How can a team spend money it doesn't have?
Then they shouldn't exist.