No Good Names Left
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2007
- 372
- 0
I don't think its anyone's job right now. How can you say it's Scrivens to lose? He hasn't proved anything. You want competition in camp and the best way is to have it completely open...
If Fasth can stay healthy, I think he's better. Scrivens really fell off the map last year at the end of the season.
However, if the number ends up at under 50% it probably means that we suck again because I think Scrivens' is going to get a long look at the start of the season and get given every chance to be the man.
It's easy at first to come into a crappy situation. It's hard to be the man for a whole season and seasons down the road.
I put it at 50/50 for now.
I think people are overrating Scrivens and underrating Fasth a bit on hfoil
I voted 50 - 59%. There is no doubt that Scrivens has talent, and can play net. There is doubt that he can handle a season being "the guy". Its not easy. Ask Salo, Shtalenkov, back up Bob Essensa, and the myriad of goalies that we have had since Cujo played here.
I won't even say Cujo was that great, he sucked regular season, you had to get the guy into the playoffs to shine. Its been a long time since the Oilers had a great goalie. To long. I don't think throwing Scrivens to the wolves is going to help him, and I have some respect for Fasth, so I am not saying he can't play.
However, we have brought in three new guys on D. Anytime you make that many changes, it takes time to get to know tendencies, and how to play as a unit. Good luck. Its going to be a tough ride, I am afraid. Goalies have to make up for all the mistakes, and they take most of the blame. To many turnovers, and to many bad decisions with the puck has lost most Oiler games. I don't expect that trend to change. I hope I am pleasantly surprised.
ya, bit of a bell shaped distribution going on. where pretty much every one is just over 50%. not a ton of confidence in him though, which is fine, he needs to prove he can hold the #1 job down.
I have plenty of confidence in him... it's just that I also have a tone of confidence in Fasth. I think these guys are going to be a decent tandem for a few years until Fasth age catches up with him.
In fairness to Salo, statistically, his first three season here trounced any Oiler goalie before or after:
1999-00 Edmonton Oilers NHL 70 1 8 4164 162 0 2 2.33 27 28 13 1713 0.914 5 0 2
2000-01 Edmonton Oilers NHL 73 1 4 4364 179 5 8 2.46 36 25 12 1677 0.904 6 0 0
2001-02 Edmonton Oilers NHL 69 1 2 4035 149 5 6 2.22 30 28 10 1564 0.913 - - -
Even Cujo, who left only one season before Salo arrived, only pitched a 2.63, 0.905 season in 1998 (his best season with the Oil)
Obviously I recognize that Salo was a bit more fragile and fell off the map quickly, but you cannot dispute those three seasons where he averaged over 70gp, under 2.40 GAA and a 0.910 spct.
No one in oiler history comes close to those three seasons.