Lust for Life
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2018
- 849
- 1,115
I like Ehlers, but I don’t think he is a need we can afford to take unless we move out Kessel or Hornqvist.
I agree, but I'm certain Kessel will be moved as well.
I like Ehlers, but I don’t think he is a need we can afford to take unless we move out Kessel or Hornqvist.
Depends how cap crunched we'd be by buying him out I suppose.
In what world is trading our first to get rid of JJ preferable to just buying him out?
I agree, but I'm certain Kessel will be moved as well.
Depends who we get. Does everyone think York really falls to 21? I know hes fallen a bit but a proven track record and was ranked anywhere from #9 to #16 from what I've seen. Dont know why some have him going to us at 21.
Would you trade Rust knowing it would land us York(and freeing up cap space)?
Or keep Rust and take whoever else falls to us ...likely being a good prospect as well.
I guess its all about how high one is on York. We haven't had great luck in drafting D but that was under Shero. York could be a game changer. Yeah hes only 18, but if hes what is expected....should be ready sooner than later and would be up during this window
A salary cap world and depends what comes back. JJ and a 1st for a 2nd would be fine given the circumstances.
Re The Ottawa thing - yes they need cap, and won't need it again all that soon, but why not keep selling the cap space again and again in their shoes, instead of having Johnson occupy it for all four years?
I'd rather target the Andrew Shaw trade with Rust if we're looking for cap space alone. 2 2nds. Use one to move up if it makes sense at the time. He's worth more than the difference in picks alone.
Moving Scuderi required him to have no term left and taking back a more expensive player with term.
Translate the same principles to Johnson and you're basically taking back Lucic to get it done.
Now, sure, there's other ways to skin the cat... but unless we're lucky with another team's valuation of Johnson, none of them pleasant.
Tbh, the more I think about it, the more it makes sense to me that the plan will be to keep him with the hope that he plays better and the expectation that Riikola gets game time if he doesn't. I don't like it, but it's beginning to sound likely.
I should have said RH shot RWs. Bjugstad certainly didn't look comfy there last season, although here's hoping that's a blip.
Re The Ottawa thing - yes they need cap, and won't need it again all that soon, but why not keep selling the cap space again and again in their shoes, instead of having Johnson occupy it for all four years?
I'd rather target the Andrew Shaw trade with Rust if we're looking for cap space alone. 2 2nds. Use one to move up if it makes sense at the time. He's worth more than the difference in picks alone.
Fair enough about not having any right shot RW... maybe instead of Tanev bring in Donskoi? That way you have Bjugstad and Donskoi as righty's? I do think Bjugstad would look comfortable playing RW if he was there full time and not moved back and forth between there and center
I would love Donskoi so much but again, I'm worrying about fitting it all in.
It’s minimum salary plus 375k. I think the league minimum is 700k
That seems like a lot of picks. Isn't Braun just a third pair guy?
I don’t understand this at all.
Must mean Ghost is gone.
That seems like a lot of picks. Isn't Braun just a third pair guy?