joshjull
Registered User
That is an interesting dynamic. But I wish there was more info to flesh this out.
Last edited:
That is an interesting dynamic. But I wish there was more info to flesh this out.
Love to know who on the Sabres were best at puck retrieval. But looking at the teams who had the best possession into the zone I think we'd be better off in that group.
That is an interesting dynamic. But I wish there was more info to flesh this out.
Lol, yeah. Second in the league in dump-in rate, first in retrieval percentage, but last in scoring. I guess that also says something about our ability to generate scoring chances when we actually have possession in the offensive zone.Well, speaks volume of the dump-and-chase strategy when it is done a ton and executed extremely well......and it leads to nothing.
Lol, yeah. Second in the league in dump-in rate, first in retrieval percentage, but last in scoring. I guess that also says something about our ability to generate scoring chances when we actually have possession in the offensive zone.
Actually, now that I think about it, that could also mean we were just not able to get the puck into the offensive zone very frequently, even with the dump in (due to always being hemmed in our own zone).
I don't see why it couldn't be both.Let’s blame it on crap defensive transition because falk was making a pass instead of coaching.
This is like the Bills always leading the league in rushing when the best teams lead it in passing.
You lead that league in dump and chase guys. All the way to a playoff drought.
I wasn’t surprised we were one of the top teams in dump ins. I was surprised we were #1 in retrieval.
I think that's the right question, and it should be compared to carry-in rates.Does anyone say what this leading retrieval rate is?
1st in dump-in retrieval champions is going to look sick next to those division champion banners.
Storied franchise.