99% of the posters here had no clue who was Romanov. Don't feel so bad.
Me too ; i knew that 90 to 99 % of the posters here had no clue who he was .I knew!
99% of the posters here had no clue who was Romanov. Don't feel so bad.
Me too ; i knew that 90 to 99 % of the posters here had no clue who he was .I knew!
Well , i hope but 100 % sure ?Hes 100% going to be a better player than Danault, theres no way hes a 4C.
Well I guess there could be some freak incident somewhereWell , i hope but 100 % sure ?
Excellent 4c's see 20-30 points consistently. If he doesnt progress much more than he is currently at than yes hes a 4c 3c tops.What are you talking about?
The MVP of the world junior tournament is a great 4C. His ceiling has been reached he definitely will never ever develop. Hot cake take
Excellent 4c's see 20-30 points consistently. If he doesnt progress much more than he is currently at than yes hes a 4c 3c tops.
Not true at all..that comeback, impressive as it was, was in a meaningless game that his team still lost.He's the ONLY reason the USA is playing for the gold, that one game where he showed up was THE reason.
Why wouldn't he and why do you believe what you're saying? He's surpassed those expectations in basically every way at this point
You win.. Happy?