thrillhous
Registered User
- Jan 5, 2006
- 3,621
- 813
Not an overage player. This is his draft + 2 season, not his draft + 3 season.He is overage born 1999 and already select by San jose in 7th round in 2017
Not an overage player. This is his draft + 2 season, not his draft + 3 season.He is overage born 1999 and already select by San jose in 7th round in 2017
Continues his stealth production mode
expect him to go first round 15-22nd
He's a project player for sure. Skating needs some work and he has a lot of help around him on his team in guys like Fortier, Chekovich, Alexeyev. He hasn't proven that he can have that line driving ability that can dictate the game for his team. He doesn't have the abilities that his Q counterparts Pelletier, Poulin and Lavoie have.There has to be something concerning his game, other than his goal scoring and physique presence that scouts aren't happy about.
Skating, positioning, engagement for the whole game, defensive coverage, hockey IQ etc. (I'm wondering what is it)
Because right now he is not cracking any scouts or scouting lists 1st round.
There has to be something concerning his game, other than his goal scoring and physique presence that scouts aren't happy about.
Skating, positioning, engagement for the whole game, defensive coverage, hockey IQ etc. (I'm wondering what is it)
Because right now he is not cracking any scouts or scouting lists 1st round.
Would a 50 goal season rise Nathan's stock? 44 goals this season, needs 6 more in his last 4 regular season games to reach 50
not sure can he do that, but if he would, could he be drafted higher with a 50 goal season under his belt?.
I don't think he'll be higher on any scout's list if he ends up with 50 goals rather than 47. Round numbers should not be a factor in scouting.
I don't think he'll be higher on any scout's list if he ends up with 50 goals rather than 47. Round numbers should not be a factor in scouting.
Is this guy going to be a huge steal in the 2nd round?
Reminds me so much of Martin Frk as a prospect.