SupremeTeam16
5-14-6-1
Took some time to come in and enjoy the meltdown and have not been disappointed.
Also this new hfboards format is bad.
Also this new hfboards format is bad.
I might be over connotating here based on DNB’s wording in his tweet, but it sounds like he made a commitment to get a deal done beyond the usual “I’ll give it the ol’ college try.”He said he’d try to trade him. Nobody wanted him. Ergo no trade happened.
It's not semantics, it's called the definition of words.
He didn't promise anything.
I realize I am in Costa Rica and out of the loop. But the eastern media was suggesting MAF did not want to go to Edmonton. I read a few oiler media guys suggesting he might
I might be over connotating here based on DNB’s wording in his tweet, but it sounds like he made a commitment to get a deal done beyond the usual “I’ll give it the ol’ college try.”
Haha true true. Although I'd rather take aggressive penalties or even lose games that way vs a lazy hook, trip, delay of game, too many men or generally being embarrassingly shutdown by teams of grinders from cities with no airport.Hopefully they have the puck and he doesn't target the knees.
He committed to it and failed. He shouldn’t have committed to it in the first place given the peculiarities of the situation.Your being pithy. (Not Pissy lol) He said he’d try. He didn’t guarantee it.
Oxford also defines guarantee as a similar word to commitment.He clearly said he wasn’t going to expend assets to move him. He offered no guarantees.
He committed to it and failed. He shouldn’t have committed to it in the first place given the peculiarities of the situation.
Oxford also defines guarantee as a similar word to commitment.
Did he commit to trying or did he commit to doing? DNB’s wording makes it sounds like the latter.He said committed to try. He tried.
Did he commit to trying or did he commit to doing? DNB’s wording makes it sounds like the latter.
There's so many hills to choose from with Holland. Don't pick this one, man.Did he commit to trying or did he commit to doing? DNB’s wording makes it sounds like the latter.
Remember when the Oilers claimed a goalie on waivers and he had to drive from I think Cali to Canada? Couldn't they do the same thing with Archibald? Waive him and if no one claims him, he makes the drive to Bako?
You guys were saying I was using the wrong words. All I’m saying is that they’re all synonyms.Holland wasn’t dealing with Oxford. He’s dealing with an unvaxxed player who knows the realities of his situation. And if he doesn’t then Archibald is dumber than I thought he was and so is his agent.
This is 100% a product of Archibald not Holland.
Holland isn’t to blame for this one.
Fair enough, I was going purely on the tweet.Trying. I watched the live press conference.
I sure do love cinnamon.You guys were saying I was using the wrong words. All I’m saying is that they’re all synonyms.
You guys were saying I was using the wrong words. All I’m saying is that they’re all synonyms.
I don’t even like Archibald. In fact I hate him as a player based on his stupid selfish play that cost us the series last year.There's so many hills to choose from with Holland. Don't pick this one, man.
He clearly said he wasn’t going to expend assets to move him. He offered no guarantees.
I just mean I'd be hugely surprised if anyone was upset at Holland because he couldn't give away Archie for free. Including Archie.I don’t like Archibald. In fact I hate him as a player based on his stupid selfish play that cost us the series last year.
Archibald had to drive back to Canada from Nebraska just a few weeks back. I don't see why not.Remember when the Oilers claimed a goalie on waivers and he had to drive from I think Cali to Canada? Couldn't they do the same thing with Archibald? Waive him and if no one claims him, he makes the drive to Bako?