Are people seriously that opposed to giving Puljujarvi his 9 games?
I am against gifting spots just cause of how high you were drafted all spots should be earned. If you play in the NHL it should be because you belong in the NHL, aside from call-ups out of necessity due to injuries or the late in season our playoff hopes are dashed and we want to give a young player a few games to better evaluate them.
I also believe in putting prospect in positions to succeed, I don't think Pulju looks ready at the moment, why set him up to fail? Send him down and call him up when he is better acclimated. I bet if he gets 50 games in the AHL he will be ready to become a full time NHLer who can make a positive impact and never get sent down again. I feel like we already have our notes on things we want him to work on, do we really need to wait 9 games to tell him what we already know? If the pre-season is enough to judge all the other players we've sent down, I don't see any reason to drag out things with Puljujarvi.
Maybe I'm wrong and Pulju will take off like a rocket right when the regular season begins, but I've seen a lot of prospects who seem worse off for being rushed then from prospects who spend a little extra time honing their craft in junior or a lower level professional league.
For me disliking the idea of keeping Puljujarvi up when pretty much everyone agrees didn't earn it based off of his play.
Is 10% I think it slightly hurts the teams ability to pick up points towards a playoff spot
30% It is bad organizational policy to gift spots, breeding a culture of hard work where spots and chances are earned just lends itself to a stronger organization in the long run.
60% It just isn't the right choice for Puljujarvi's long term development. We are very bad at developing players and I see decisions like this contributing to that trend.