Hemsky4pm2
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2017
- 854
- 626
I think the scale of some of the trade (like Meier) are encouraging. If the Oilers want to do something significant, there should be some willing dance partners out there.
In an effort to add impact D (e.g. Karlsson #1, Chychrun #2, Ekholm #3, Parayko #4) I would imagine the Oilers - for contract reasons - would be trying to move out at least three of the following:
Campbell, Ceci, Kulak, Puljuujarvi, Yamamoto, Foegele, Janmark
Then movable cheap players and other assets:
Any draft pick (including 1st in 2023, 2024 and 2025)
Bouchard
Broberg
Holloway
Bourgault
Schaefer
Lavoie
Savoie
Tullio
Niemelainen
Kesselring
If they can get creative, it might be possible to do something significant and add one of the aforementioned D along with a couple of more productive forwards who are under team control. Karlsson is actually the player that makes the most sense in terms of a deal where the other party would take Campbell back. They both have 4 years left on their deals after this season. The Oilers could actually agree to take on nearly the entire cap hit on Karlsson (11.5M) if the Sharks took back Campbell, Barrie and JP (12.5M) (plus picks and maybe a B prospect) - have the Sharks also take Janmark (1.25M), retain 50% on Reimer (1.125M) and send Lorentz/Gregor and Bonino to the Oilers. The Sharks could easily flip out Barrie this year or next for another asset (2nd rounder+ likely). Before dismissing this out of hand - look at the scale of trade happening right now.
You have to consider SJ's position - they are in full rebuild now. They can completely shift their salary structure in 2-3 years by moving out Karlsson. Campbell becomes a risky proposition - but is an NHL player and could bounce back down the road. There's also a case to be made that Campbell still isn't on a deal any worse than half a dozen other keepers. Their alternative is probably just keeping Karlsson indefinitely - and the 7.5M in additional expense tied to his deal compared to Karlsson's.
Campbell is tradable. Some people don't seem to want to believe it. He's not the only bad contract in the league. Other goalies that don't have full trade protection and have terrible contracts include: Binnington, Gibson, Grubauer, Drieger, Murray, Nedeljevic... then you have other decent guys with ok contracts but no trade protection like Saros, Hart, Jarry and Demko.
Holland made the mistake of signing Campbell, but it isn't impossible to get out from under that mistake. Acquiring Karlsson is the best hope to achieve that. It's a huge risk - but the Oilers are in that 2 season window now where they have to take significant risks to win it all.
In an effort to add impact D (e.g. Karlsson #1, Chychrun #2, Ekholm #3, Parayko #4) I would imagine the Oilers - for contract reasons - would be trying to move out at least three of the following:
Campbell, Ceci, Kulak, Puljuujarvi, Yamamoto, Foegele, Janmark
Then movable cheap players and other assets:
Any draft pick (including 1st in 2023, 2024 and 2025)
Bouchard
Broberg
Holloway
Bourgault
Schaefer
Lavoie
Savoie
Tullio
Niemelainen
Kesselring
If they can get creative, it might be possible to do something significant and add one of the aforementioned D along with a couple of more productive forwards who are under team control. Karlsson is actually the player that makes the most sense in terms of a deal where the other party would take Campbell back. They both have 4 years left on their deals after this season. The Oilers could actually agree to take on nearly the entire cap hit on Karlsson (11.5M) if the Sharks took back Campbell, Barrie and JP (12.5M) (plus picks and maybe a B prospect) - have the Sharks also take Janmark (1.25M), retain 50% on Reimer (1.125M) and send Lorentz/Gregor and Bonino to the Oilers. The Sharks could easily flip out Barrie this year or next for another asset (2nd rounder+ likely). Before dismissing this out of hand - look at the scale of trade happening right now.
You have to consider SJ's position - they are in full rebuild now. They can completely shift their salary structure in 2-3 years by moving out Karlsson. Campbell becomes a risky proposition - but is an NHL player and could bounce back down the road. There's also a case to be made that Campbell still isn't on a deal any worse than half a dozen other keepers. Their alternative is probably just keeping Karlsson indefinitely - and the 7.5M in additional expense tied to his deal compared to Karlsson's.
Campbell is tradable. Some people don't seem to want to believe it. He's not the only bad contract in the league. Other goalies that don't have full trade protection and have terrible contracts include: Binnington, Gibson, Grubauer, Drieger, Murray, Nedeljevic... then you have other decent guys with ok contracts but no trade protection like Saros, Hart, Jarry and Demko.
Holland made the mistake of signing Campbell, but it isn't impossible to get out from under that mistake. Acquiring Karlsson is the best hope to achieve that. It's a huge risk - but the Oilers are in that 2 season window now where they have to take significant risks to win it all.