Bryanbryoil
Pray For Ukraine
- Sep 13, 2004
- 86,196
- 34,653
I could see this offseason being salvaged a bit if they found a way to bring in Tatar, but I don't see it happening.
I hate this whole "guys trust Kassian in the top six" narrative is back.
We're not deep enough still, anywhere.
lol, the forwards are as deep as we have had in a very long time...Such hyperbole, such doom.I could see this offseason being salvaged a bit if they found a way to bring in Tatar, but I don't see it happening.
I hate this whole "guys trust Kassian in the top six" narrative is back.
We're not deep enough still, anywhere.
lol, the forwards are as deep as we have had in a very long time...
It's about 50-50 that any goalie we bring in at this point will be better than Koskinen this coming year. Hell even Price was only .901 in the regular season. Look at the guys who moved last year:
Talbot .915
Greiss .912
Allen .907
Markstrom .904
<Koskinen> .899
Dubnyk .895
Murray .893
Holtby .889
Dell .857
The most likely outcome in a Koskinen trade is a guy who would perform about the same as Koskinen. Buying him out never made any sense and giving up assets just for the sake of change doesn't either. Same as on defense, the fix needs to come from internal development, and we have spent a bunch of recent picks on goalies (Skinner, Konavalov, Rodrigue, Wells). Our system is packed with them.
I think we should go into the year with Smith and Kos. Let Kos and Stalock battle for backup in camp, and give Skinner and Konavalov NHL games as well this season if they are playing well. That's 5 guys and we don't need any more unless Pittsburg want to do a cap neutral trade like Kos (salary retained) and Skinner for Jarry. I'd do that but not sure PIT would unless they really want to off-load Jarry's contract early. Maybe NYR does a similar trade for Georgiev but he wasn't much better than Kos last year.
No silver bullets out there and no guarantee moving on from Kos will produce improvement.
I mean..it could be a LOT worse. We could be stuck with Markstrom if he put up the same numbers as Koskinen and he'd be here for 6+ more years lol.
Despite the save percentage, Markstrom looked better than his numbers suggested.
I genuinely believe he would have had much better numbers here.
I'm not advocating for Mart Murray either, but I think he also would have done a lot better here.
Aside from the elite few goaltenders, goaltending is generally largely a product of the system.
It's hard when a guy like Koskinen is given a system to succeed, but he fails too many times at stopping the shot that the defense keeps to the outside.
Even the best goalies will make several mistakes in a season. But his are plentiful and poorly timed.
So if another goalie had similar numbers, you have to judge if their style would do better in our system, than where they just were.
It's about 50-50 that any goalie we bring in at this point will be better than Koskinen this coming year. Hell even Price was only .901 in the regular season. Look at the guys who moved last year:
Talbot .915
Greiss .912
Allen .907
Markstrom .904
<Koskinen> .899
Dubnyk .895
Murray .893
Holtby .889
Dell .857
The most likely outcome in a Koskinen trade is a guy who would perform about the same as Koskinen. Buying him out never made any sense and giving up assets just for the sake of change doesn't either. Same as on defense, the fix needs to come from internal development, and we have spent a bunch of recent picks on goalies (Skinner, Konavalov, Rodrigue, Wells). Our system is packed with them.
I think we should go into the year with Smith and Kos. Let Kos and Stalock battle for backup in camp, and give Skinner and Konavalov NHL games as well this season if they are playing well. That's 5 guys and we don't need any more. Maybe Pittsburg wants to do a cap neutral trade like Kos (salary retained) and Skinner for Jarry. I'd do that but not sure PIT would unless they really want to off-load Jarry's contract early. Maybe NYR does a similar trade for Georgiev but he wasn't much better than Kos last year.
No silver bullets out there and no guarantee moving on from Kos will produce improvement.
Reminds me of an old joke. 6 revolutionaries are in the jungle for 6months. They are abit blue. Der leader comes to them to try to cheer them up, he asks, he has good news and bad which would they like first. They choose good. The news is, they have a underwear switch available…. In much the same way switching underperforming goalies could help everyone involved.It's about 50-50 that any goalie we bring in at this point will be better than Koskinen this coming year. Hell even Price was only .901 in the regular season. Look at the guys who moved last year:
Talbot .915
Greiss .912
Allen .907
Markstrom .904
<Koskinen> .899
Dubnyk .895
Murray .893
Holtby .889
Dell .857
The most likely outcome in a Koskinen trade is a guy who would perform about the same as Koskinen. Buying him out never made any sense and giving up assets just for the sake of change doesn't either. Same as on defense, the fix needs to come from internal development, and we have spent a bunch of recent picks on goalies (Skinner, Konavalov, Rodrigue, Wells). Our system is packed with them.
I think we should go into the year with Smith and Kos. Let Kos and Stalock battle for backup in camp, and give Skinner and Konavalov NHL games as well this season if they are playing well. That's 5 guys and we don't need any more. Maybe Pittsburg wants to do a cap neutral trade like Kos (salary retained) and Skinner for Jarry. I'd do that but not sure PIT would unless they really want to off-load Jarry's contract early. Maybe NYR does a similar trade for Georgiev but he wasn't much better than Kos last year.
No silver bullets out there and no guarantee moving on from Kos will produce improvement.
No kidding. Weren't we something like 9th last year in 5on5 scoring. Yeah, a lot of that's due to McD and Drai, but come on, bringing Foegele and Hyman in definitely improves our forward group. Defence we'll have to wait and see. Keith, Ceci, and Bouchard are all a bit of an unknown at this time as to how they're going to perform. Compare what we've done to what a number of other teams have done and then tell me our offseason needs to be "salvaged".lol, the forwards are as deep as we have had in a very long time...Such hyperbole, such doom.
The cup winner:
Coleman-Gourde-Goodrow
Colton-Johnson-Maroon
vs
Foegele-McLeod-Kassian
Shore-Ryan-Archibald
Man it's practically the same. We should win the cup easily. Hail Holland!
I guess with Kassian being spoonfed his top six time, we can expect Jesse P on that 3rd line instead.
By the way - I'm not even disagreeing with what you're saying. What I am saying is, Foegele is our best bottom six player and that tells you how pathetic the bottom six has been for a long, long time.
Foegele on his own team was a fringe 3rd/strong 4th line guy. Our 3rd line is still quite non-existent. Holloway/Lavoie/Bourgault hopefully change that someday.
The cup winner:
Coleman-Gourde-Goodrow
Colton-Johnson-Maroon
vs
Foegele-McLeod-Kassian
Shore-Ryan-Archibald
Man it's practically the same. We should win the cup easily. Hail Holland!
I guess with Kassian being spoonfed his top six time, we can expect Jesse P on that 3rd line instead.
By the way - I'm not even disagreeing with what you're saying. What I am saying is, Foegele is our best bottom six player and that tells you how pathetic the bottom six has been for a long, long time.
Foegele on his own team was a fringe 3rd/strong 4th line guy. Our 3rd line is still quite non-existent. Holloway/Lavoie/Bourgault hopefully change that someday.
I don't think our bottom-6 is nearly strong enough either, but Foegele was not a "strong 4th line" player last year. He was a borderline 2nd lien winger/strong 3rd line winger, and all the stats back that up as well.
I could see this offseason being salvaged a bit if they found a way to bring in Tatar, but I don't see it happening.
I hate this whole "guys trust Kassian in the top six" narrative is back.
We're not deep enough still, anywhere.
lol, the forwards are as deep as we have had in a very long time...Such hyperbole, such doom.
The cup winner:
Coleman-Gourde-Goodrow
Colton-Johnson-Maroon
vs
Foegele-McLeod-Kassian
Shore-Ryan-Archibald
Man it's practically the same. We should win the cup easily. Hail Holland!
I guess with Kassian being spoonfed his top six time, we can expect Jesse P on that 3rd line instead.
By the way - I'm not even disagreeing with what you're saying. What I am saying is, Foegele is our best bottom six player and that tells you how pathetic the bottom six has been for a long, long time.
Foegele on his own team was a fringe 3rd/strong 4th line guy. Our 3rd line is still quite non-existent. Holloway/Lavoie/Bourgault hopefully change that someday.
You gotta stop comparing teams to the tampa bay lightning who were almost 20M over the cap. Because of it they've already lost 4 of those guys.
That 4 goal game is overplayed. Two of those were wide open shots with time in the kill zone that guys placed perfectly. Grant Fuhr wasn't saving those. The other two were knuckleball bounces from in tight. The Oilers were a bloody joke defensively in that game but all people remember is the goalie. Every goalie has a bad night, even the best, but shyting on your goalie can come back to haunt you. Careful what you wish for.
Kos is certainly not Roy. He's pretty much a league average or slightly below guy who was given a ridiculous contract. Like that's his fault. Unless someone will take his contract in exchange for another guy with issues (Jarry, Georgiev) then it's dumb to lose assets trading him and then watch him be a league average goalie again. The guy has maybe 30-40 games left as an Oiler and a smart GM/coach/team figure out a way to make those as effective as possible.
I would absolutely agree if it wasn't the logical conclusion to a consistent problem in Koskinen's play. The other thing, you referenced 2 HHOFers who had bad games, no one is saying guys don't have bad games, but that's not Koskinen's situation. His situation is an underwhelming goalie who constantly lets in the first shot of the game, having the logical conclusion to that flaw in his game.That 4 goal game is overplayed
Our defense and goaltending is being heralded near bottom of the league. We have enough problems without making stuff up.
Our forward group is top 5 in the league. Can't compare to a tax free cheater team, sure, but otherwise the forwards are a great group AND we have a couple prospects knocking on the door.
I don't think our bottom-6 is nearly strong enough either, but Foegele was not a "strong 4th line" player last year. He was a borderline 2nd line winger/strong 3rd line winger, and all the stats back that up as well.
We only have Nurse and Barrie returning to that defensive core, assuming Russell is in the press box.We were 9th in goals against last year. So yeah people are kind of making stuff up.
And this is bad because? Keith is an upgrade on the No one that was there, Larsson is probably better then Ceci, Bear and Bouchard is a push and they need one more guy.We only have Nurse and Barrie returning to that defensive core, assuming Russell is in the press box.