Icicle
Think big
- Oct 16, 2005
- 6,055
- 1,007
Obviously with 30 picks and 23 roster spots someone will have to go to the AHL. That someone could be Ullmark.
Vegas can take a bad goalie contract (1-2yrs left) and then have Ullmark step in then.
Your notion that Ennis/Moulson does not make sense for Vegas is shortsighted. Ennis or Moulson would be attractive to Vegas... for a price. That goes for virtually any bad contract in the league on 30 other teams.
Ullmark is definitely one of the only "valuable" pieces Vegas can pick from Buffalo due to our roster.
Every team has an Ullmark. The difference that has to be made is the value of our exposed players versus the other teams with marginal/high cap exposures only versus their up and coming goaltender who are arguably going to be similar. 3 of their 30 are going to be goalie picks, and they need a starter. They likely sign the back-up in UFA, so they have two or three minor league goalies they're looking at picking.
Is Buffalo the weakest or second weakest exposure list sans goalie that Vegas is looking at? Ennis, Moulson, Gorges, Falk, Deslauries, Kea, Austin isn't exactly an enticing list to look at.
It'll come down to whether they see an Ennis reclamation as an upside or Moulson as a capable scoring plug. If you expose Lehner I have a hard time believing he wouldn't be their instant pick.
I think our best chance going into it is trading Kane for a defenseman from another team + Ennis pick assurance is our best case scenario at the expansion draft. If no deal is made, yeah, Ullmark is likely gone, but losing him isn't the biggest loss for us, losing the opportunity to shed one of Ennis or Moulson's contracts is the loss we'd be looking at.
Last edited: