A good number of people on this board were fine with the Letang contract, and once Johnston was hired, many were ecstatic.
If you have a ridiculously embarrassing, poor opinion of Letang, that's fine, but please don't project it on others.
Anyhow, acquiring Staal now wouldn't be as bad as it was 3 years ago, and I'm shocked so many people are against it.
1) The winger situation now is infinitely better than it was when Staal was here.
2) Those wingers are on decent contracts, are young, and should be around for a while
3) Brandon Sutter will command a raise. He's not worth it, but he'll get it. It will be to the point where you are paying him within 1 or 2 million of what Jordan Staal is making.
A good 3C nowadays will either be on his ELC/Bridge contract or making 5M. Since Jordan Staal is the best of the best, 6M is right in line.
4) Without Cap Geek it's a bit hard, but I'm almost positive a great purging is not necessary to bring Staal in and maintain roster integrity.
I'm surprised so many people are claiming it does, without doing the math.
5) With Perron, Hornqvist, Comeau, and Bennett, plus Kapanen and whatever other finds they have in the off-season, your top-6 might not be set, but it's the best it's been in quite some time. Meanwhile, the bottom-6 continues to be a mess.
6) I like everything I read about Sundqvist, but it's unrealistic to expect him to be a 15-minute a night guy in his first season. 4C or some winger time should be his destiny for the first two seasons. AND THAT'S OKAY. Jesus, it's fine to have him work his way up. His game sounds tailor made for that.
7) People keep talking about the Penguins' lack of size and physicality. Staal instantly transforms his line. In fact, I would argue that having a 3rd line of something like
Spaling - Staal - Bennett immediately frees up Letang's pair from the "shutdown" role, allows you to use Despres/Scuderi or whoever, and let's Letang, Crosby, and Malkin play much freer roles than they play now.
If we can move those 3, how much money is that?
Sutter- 3.3
Kunitz- 3.85
Scuds- 3.375
Round 10.5M? We can bring in some solid help with that additional 4.5M, say a Sekera or Bergenheim
No, because his decision making isn't as sound. His physical gifts are right up there among the best.
When Ehrhoff was healthy, especially at the start of the season, wasn't he playing the shutdown role?
Great avatar
Both Oshie and Eriksson make exactly $4.5 million, so people saying we can't fit in a good winger with bringing in Staal aren't doing the math.
Both Oshie and Eriksson make exactly $4.5 million, so people saying we can't fit in a good winger with bringing in Staal aren't doing the math.
You don't think those other players make bad decisions with the puck? I hate to break it to you but they do not go entire seasons without mistakes. Especially Doughty.
The problem come the year after that with Perron Despres Maatta extensions/raise
We can't afford the pieces for Oshie. Maybe Eriksson, but how likely is it that Boston is gonna trade Eriksson to us
The problem come the year after that with Perron Despres Maatta extensions/raise
We can't afford the pieces for Oshie. Maybe Eriksson, but how likely is it that Boston is gonna trade Eriksson to us
If they get the right return, I don't see why they wouldn't. They did trade Boychuk to the Islanders instead of Edmonton.
Eriksson is a UFA after next year, so we could walk away from him if we needed to. Also, those 4 will likely be getting around $14 million, which should still be workable with our cap. We just can't be handing out multi year deals like candy this summer. We need another Ehrhoff situation like last year (1 year deal for cheap).
Yepp, we don't have anything the Blues need and the Bruins won't do us any favours.
I don't think Boston thought NYI would do as well as they did...
I wonder if a trade with Boston involving Letang and Lucic would be viable
I wonder if a trade with Boston involving Letang and Lucic would be viable
In a perfect world, we're getting rid of Sutter, Kunitz, and Scuderi's contracts between now and October. We're losing Martin's deal as we let him walk. We're losing Ehrhoff's deal as we let him walk. That's a huge chunk of money to work with in terms of retooling the roster. Add to that Dupuis' deal as I doubt he ever plays again. You're looking at $24M in free space to fill out the roster. Assume Staal's coming back, that's still $18M.
Perron - Crosby - Hornqvist
Staal - Malkin - Comeau
XXXX - Spaling - Bennett
Farnham - Lapierre - XXXX
Letang - Maatta
Despres - XXXX
Harrington - Pouliot
Dumoulin
That's a huge chunk of change to fill out a top 4 defenseman, a 3rd line winger and a 4th line winger. You could very realistically land a guy I'd be gunning for in Boychuk and still have $12M+ to spend on two bottom six players, or one bottom six player and a 2nd line winger for Geno if Staal's gonna be 3C.
I don't think Boston thought NYI would do as well as they did...
I really don't think GMs are as petty as HFers are tbh. Really, I don't think the Bruins trading us Eriksson is any different or any more unlikely than the Hawks trading us Sharp. As long as they get a solid return, I don't think it would matter.
I wonder if a trade with Boston involving Letang and Lucic would be viable
You gotta be high if you think taking on a $6M/year for 8 year third line center.. who would be a tweener in the top-6