I'm going to guess a Kreider deal is either incentive-based like the Zucc deal or simply focused around a younger player. If we want a guaranteed first, we're probably going to have to package Kreider with additional assets to raise the value of the trade on both sides.
Hypothetically, let's say that COL deal for Jost actually materializes. Would Kreider and the DAL 2020 3rd for Jost and conditional 2020 3rd (becomes either something like a 2021 2nd or a 2020 1st if they make the ECF and/or he re-signs) be a bad deal?
Schenn has an 8 year deal kicking in at $6.5M. I'm not too sure I'd want to get locked in on a long-term deal like that for a 28 year old.
Again, it’s more an example of the kinds of phone calls I’d be making. I’d rather have 28 year old Schenn for 8 years at 6.5 than Kreider for 6 years at 6.5, but my point wasn’t to specifically hone in on Schenn. It was to be proactive in deciding where we want to make changes and looking at NHL rosters to see if we can entice them enough to give up the kind of player we specifically want to target. Skjei and Howden for E. Kane comes to mind as well. Again, probably not realistic, but just examples of phone calls I’d make.