This team is going to regret it if they give Shattenkirk a big pay day.
I mean... what is a big pay day for Shatty? Is 5 years at 6 million a big pay day? 7x7?
This team is going to regret it if they give Shattenkirk a big pay day.
This team is going to regret it if they give Shattenkirk a big pay day.
I mean... what is a big pay day for Shatty? Is 5 years at 6 million a big pay day? 7x7?
I think so, yes. I'd reserve that kind of money for guys who I have confidence putting out against top competition. I think Shattenkirk is a 2nd pairing guy who needs a very solid partner as a safety net. Will he get you a bunch of points? Probably, but scoring isn't the issue with this team. It's getting the puck out of their zone and keeping it out of their net. Give McDonagh a guy who can be his safety net and you have two pairings who shouldn't have much issue accomplishing that goal. I think putting Shattenkirk with McDonagh will be a failure.
I think so, yes. I'd reserve that kind of money for guys who I have confidence putting out against top competition. I think Shattenkirk is a 2nd pairing guy who needs a very solid partner as a safety net. Will he get you a bunch of points? Probably, but scoring isn't the issue with this team. It's getting the puck out of their zone and keeping it out of their net. Give McDonagh a guy who can be his safety net and you have two pairings who shouldn't have much issue accomplishing that goal. I think putting Shattenkirk with McDonagh will be a failure.
27 and 76 would look pretty nice together.
then 42 with shatty as the 2nd pair.
i think 27 needs a mate that can skate and play smart defense and allow ryan to play up ice and use his wheels to push pucks. the ability for his partner to recover and make the right reads allows 27 to take chances and have the confidence his partner can cover for him. thats brady skjei.
shatty would pair well with 42 who adds a defensive edge to that pair.
tbh, the new nhl defenseman is in the mold of shatty. puck moving, offensively capable guy who skates well and shoots it.
27 and 76 also meet that criteria. they are both prototypical nhl dman.
say what you want, but shattenkirk fits this team like a glove.
27/76
42/shatty
thats a very nice top 4.
it all depends on the $$.
So Skjei - Shattenkirk?
27 and 76 would look pretty nice together.
then 42 with shatty as the 2nd pair.
i think 27 needs a mate that can skate and play smart defense and allow ryan to play up ice and use his wheels to push pucks. the ability for his partner to recover and make the right reads allows 27 to take chances and have the confidence his partner can cover for him. thats brady skjei.
shatty would pair well with 42 who adds a defensive edge to that pair.
tbh, the new nhl defenseman is in the mold of shatty. puck moving, offensively capable guy who skates well and shoots it.
27 and 76 also meet that criteria. they are both prototypical nhl dman.
say what you want, but shattenkirk fits this team like a glove.
27/76
42/shatty
thats a very nice top 4.
it all depends on the $$.
Putting a guy on his weaker side just to accommodate Shattenkirk doesn't look like a glove fit to me. It looks like we're making concessions because he's the easiest option. You've said it several times already in the last thread: "All he costs is money." That's the easy way out.
The "new NHL defensemen" might be a guy who can skate and move the puck, but it doesn't mean you have to sacrifice defensive prowess.
https://www.championat.com/hockey/n...ereglazov-prodolzhit-kareru-v-rejndzhers.html
Looks like Bereglazov is coming to the Rangers.
Putting a guy on his weaker side just to accommodate Shattenkirk doesn't look like a glove fit to me. It looks like we're making concessions because he's the easiest option. You've said it several times already in the last thread: "All he costs is money." That's the easy way out.
The "new NHL defensemen" might be a guy who can skate and move the puck, but it doesn't mean you have to sacrifice defensive prowess.
Then you're still looking for a guy to play with McDonagh.