Lost Horizons
Registered User
1) The whole section with Rick Rubin in the studio was pretty much about Wildflowers. Mostly about how Tom decided to phase out Stan once and for all during those sessions and bring in Steve Ferrone as permanent drummer.
4) I the idea of Tom being the leader was a thread that ran thru the whole thing. Guys being somewhat bitter (like Benmont) and others being full blown mad (Stan) and Mike just kinda going with it because he was always trusted by Tom and always in the fold.
5) It was a 4 hour doc. I really don't see what more could be added.
1 It wasn't in depth and it could have been. Whether about the impact of the album as a whole or how it performed
4 The issues with Stan pre dated that meeting. Him and Tom pretty much had problems since day one. They didn't even touch on Mike and Stans problems with each other. From the late 80's through Stans firing they never spoke to each another because of a fight that happened in Italy. Band tensions happen but when a meeting is called to lay things out like they did, a meeting that causes ripples through the band for years to come it should have been covered since it was already out there
5 The could have squeezed things in that needed to be told. If you're going to tell a story tell the whole thing. They talk about drugs in general and talk about Howie's heroin use but omit Tom's heroin phase during the 90's. It's ok to talk about Tom's outside writing and producing but barely mentions other members outside work. Stan and Mike work on multiple Don Henley albums deserved to get more attention.
again I'm a huge fan and have been for decades but I still feel it could have been better. It's good but could have been great.
Last edited: