mooseOAK*
Guest
Postman said:Jordan Leopold, Paul Martin, J.M. Liles... just within the past few years.
Yeah, but there haven't been that many overall.
Postman said:Jordan Leopold, Paul Martin, J.M. Liles... just within the past few years.
Jacobv2 said:Orpik, Hale, Komisarek, Jillson.
mooseOAK said:Orpik and Jillson are on their way to first round bust territory. The other guys, it is too early to tell for sure.
mooseOAK said:Orpik and Jillson are on their way to first round bust territory. The other guys, it is too early to tell for sure.
nomorekids said:Man, you should probably give me that shovel. If you dig yourself any deeper, I'm afraid we might never see you again!
mooseOAK said:Orpik has done nothing of note that I have seen, since all I do is watch Leafs games and think about what my next unsubstantiated post on HF will be and Jillson has been traded two, technically three times already.
That made me laugh.nomorekids said:Oh, okay.
Pens4ever said:That made me laugh.
Orpik a bust...okay.
MooseOAK, you seriously haven't seen him play have you. Tell me how many times you have seen him play.
nomorekids said:Oh, okay I have nothing to offer myself so I will try to be cute.
mooseOAK said:Not that often but this whole site is built around people making comments about players they haven't seen very often if at all, isn't it?
I see a guy who is 24 and has only played 85 NHL games on arguably the easiest defence in the league to crack.
nomorekids said:So, because the Pens actually let a guy finish school\develop a bit in the AHL...he's a bust?
Oh...and I'd take either over Colaiacovo. Shrug.
mooseOAK said:The really good ones, which was my original point, move to the front of the line especially on a team with little or no depth.
Really? What a shock!
mooseOAK said:Not that often but this whole site is built around people making comments about players they haven't seen very often if at all, isn't it?
I see a guy who is 24 and has only played 85 NHL games on arguably the easiest defence in the league to crack.
mooseOAK said:The really good ones, which was my original point, move to the front of the line especially on a team with little or no depth.
andora said:ok, when you're talking about collegiate players, please don't use his age as a negative, as you will just make yourself look foolish
where has he gone wrong? where is orpik's true mistake, is becoming an nhler at 24 rather than 22 bad? or a failure?
mooseOAK said:Whatever that's supposed to mean. 24 is 24 no matter where he played.
Does it make him a successful first round pick? Or, could a team find a guy that takes that long to develop in the lower rounds
Orpik is an injury free Mark Tinordi with better puck control. A better more modern comparison is a similar game and skill level to Adam Foote. He is that good.mooseOAK said:Whatever that's supposed to mean. 24 is 24 no matter where he played.
Does it make him a successful first round pick? Or, could a team find a guy that takes that long to develop in the lower rounds
nomorekids said:so by your logic, giguere was a bust as well..because he took til age 25-26 to be a successful starter?
craig1 said:....oh, and of the 17 people drafted ahead of him, only 6 have played more games than him. The only one of those six that is a d-man is Klesla, who arguably should have been allowed more time to develop at lower levels himself (ps Jacket fans....I love Klesla, and would want him on my team. Just using a legit comparison. Not meant as a shot at him.)
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/draft/nhl2000e.html
I got to see him about 15 times on TV his first 2 seasons in the league.......he had a lot to learn, as did Kaberle who spent a few years after being drafted, in the Czech Republic developing, before coming over.mooseOAK said:Klesla could be like Kaberle was, not a perfect NHL defenseman at a young age but nothing to learn from being in the AHL.