Oh ffs, can we please retire this. Tangradi's not playing because of veteran favoritism, Scott Harrington's not on our first D pairing because of veteran favoritism, Jeffrey's on the fourth line because of veteran favoritism, Bennett can't score because of veteran favoritism (etc, etc, etc).
As if events hadn't borne out that the "veteran reputation" thing was a canard all these years and that the "young players" weren't playing simply because they were all bad, as each has subsequently demonstrated elsewhere. The reality is we have injected an astounding number of rookies into the roster in the past two seasons, many of which had no pedigree whatsoever. Turns out the Penguins were playing all those vets because they were waiting for younger players who could, you know, actually play better than them.
And once younger players who could actually play emerged, what was the result?
-There were 3 rookie regulars in the lineup tonight, including a 1st line forward and the starting (now franchise) goaltender. Do you know how rare it is for a competitive NHL club to tell a rookie netminder "you're the guy now?" Putting a 3rd round draft pick 1st year pro out there with a Hart trophy center isn't common, either. Kuhnhackl and Dumoulin are 2nd year players and another 2 2nd year players would have been in the lineup (with Fehr, a veteran, scratched...Fehr has also been scratched for an absolute nobody 27 year old rook as recently as a week ago) in prominent roles if they weren't hurt. That's 7 1st and 2nd year roster players making contributions on a regular basis for the Pittsburgh Penguins, or more than a third of the roster.
This is the exact opposite of making decisions based on "veteran reputation."