HighlightReel93
Registered User
With the 2014 NHL Draft (June 27th-28th) just days away and an impeding deal to ship Sens forward and captain Jason Spezza out of town looming, the question remains:
Are the Ottawa Senators currently rebuilding or retooling?
To clarify, here are the definitions for both terms provided by Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Re·tool
adapt or alter (someone or something) to make them more useful or suitable.
Re·build
build (something) again after it has been damaged or destroyed.
There are multiple different ways to look at this puzzle. If the Ottawa Senators were rebuilding right now, one could say then they would be trading Craig Anderson, Chris Phillips and Chris Neil all for draft picks in the upcoming draft.
Is that happening? No.
HOWEVER, is trading away Spezza, a point per game player, for a draft pick, a prospect and a top six forward - a retooling move?
Normally the answer would be yes.
The Anaheim Ducks traded away Bobby Ryan to the Ottawa Senators last summer for the exact same package the Sens want for Spezza, now. This is considered a retooling move as the Anaheim Ducks don't have an "internal budget" and aren't restricted by their owner to bring in high paid free agents, if the fit was right.
The Ottawa Senators on the other hand DO have an "internal budget", unfortunately.
Fun Fact: Ducks owner Henry Samueli is worth 2.1 billion according to Forbes, up 11.3 million alone from last year. Sens owner Eugene Melnyk is only worth 1 billion according to CanadianBuisness.com and that number seems to be shrinking...
As stated before, Spezza requested a trade because management couldn't commit to bringing in high end talent, if it meant spending significantly more money.
"Anytime you feel you have to make a trade, or you want to make a trade, the earlier the better but ... but ... <strong>but you may not get the same value in return so I'm not going to rush into it just for the sake of rushing into it and get it out of the way. I'm trying to go with what I think the value is for Jason Spezza."
- Bryan Murray via Ottawa Sun
Do you really think Murray wants to trade Spezza when "they may not get the same value in return" for him?
Of course not!
The same reason why Ottawa lost Daniel Alfredsson is the same reason why they're going to lose Spezza.
This guy.
Is it possible to ever consider a professional sports franchise in a retooling stage when they have an "internal budget" well below the actual league's salary cap?
YES ... to a degree.
With that being said, the Senators right now are in the final stage of their "supposed" rebuild - whether they want to admit it or not.
They are waiting for their wealth of prospects (Cody Ceci, Eric Gryba, Patrick Weircioch, Robin Lehner, Mika Zibanejad, Mike Hoffman, Mark Stone, Shane Prince, Curtis Lazar) to develop into the "high end" talent they hope they can be.
The problem is, like in all sports, not all of a team's prospects will ACTUALLY develop into "high end" talent like Melnyk mystically thinks they will. Even if this was the case and all their prospects into productive NHL players, or even 1/4 of them, could Melnyk afford to keep them?
The only way the Senators can win in this system is if they have an astounding year while having all of these prospects still at a relatively low salary.
That's the bottom line. This window is only going last a few years, and last year was the first trial run.
We all know how that turned out.
Thankfully, players are still developing and there's still time for success.
You've just got to have faith.
Via: Nilsen Report
Are the Ottawa Senators currently rebuilding or retooling?
To clarify, here are the definitions for both terms provided by Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Re·tool
adapt or alter (someone or something) to make them more useful or suitable.
Re·build
build (something) again after it has been damaged or destroyed.
There are multiple different ways to look at this puzzle. If the Ottawa Senators were rebuilding right now, one could say then they would be trading Craig Anderson, Chris Phillips and Chris Neil all for draft picks in the upcoming draft.
Is that happening? No.
HOWEVER, is trading away Spezza, a point per game player, for a draft pick, a prospect and a top six forward - a retooling move?
Normally the answer would be yes.
The Anaheim Ducks traded away Bobby Ryan to the Ottawa Senators last summer for the exact same package the Sens want for Spezza, now. This is considered a retooling move as the Anaheim Ducks don't have an "internal budget" and aren't restricted by their owner to bring in high paid free agents, if the fit was right.
The Ottawa Senators on the other hand DO have an "internal budget", unfortunately.
Fun Fact: Ducks owner Henry Samueli is worth 2.1 billion according to Forbes, up 11.3 million alone from last year. Sens owner Eugene Melnyk is only worth 1 billion according to CanadianBuisness.com and that number seems to be shrinking...
As stated before, Spezza requested a trade because management couldn't commit to bringing in high end talent, if it meant spending significantly more money.
"Anytime you feel you have to make a trade, or you want to make a trade, the earlier the better but ... but ... <strong>but you may not get the same value in return so I'm not going to rush into it just for the sake of rushing into it and get it out of the way. I'm trying to go with what I think the value is for Jason Spezza."
- Bryan Murray via Ottawa Sun
Do you really think Murray wants to trade Spezza when "they may not get the same value in return" for him?
Of course not!
The same reason why Ottawa lost Daniel Alfredsson is the same reason why they're going to lose Spezza.
This guy.
Is it possible to ever consider a professional sports franchise in a retooling stage when they have an "internal budget" well below the actual league's salary cap?
YES ... to a degree.
With that being said, the Senators right now are in the final stage of their "supposed" rebuild - whether they want to admit it or not.
They are waiting for their wealth of prospects (Cody Ceci, Eric Gryba, Patrick Weircioch, Robin Lehner, Mika Zibanejad, Mike Hoffman, Mark Stone, Shane Prince, Curtis Lazar) to develop into the "high end" talent they hope they can be.
The problem is, like in all sports, not all of a team's prospects will ACTUALLY develop into "high end" talent like Melnyk mystically thinks they will. Even if this was the case and all their prospects into productive NHL players, or even 1/4 of them, could Melnyk afford to keep them?
The only way the Senators can win in this system is if they have an astounding year while having all of these prospects still at a relatively low salary.
That's the bottom line. This window is only going last a few years, and last year was the first trial run.
We all know how that turned out.
Thankfully, players are still developing and there's still time for success.
You've just got to have faith.
Via: Nilsen Report