SPG
Registered User
everyone's impacted pretty much evenly.
That sums it all up right there. Just use your challenges wisely when the time comes, people.
everyone's impacted pretty much evenly.
That sums it all up right there. Just use your challenges wisely when the time comes, people.
Yeah bingo. I mean all of us have some ratings which are fishy. For me, Darius Kasparitis is a 68OV, in which he was coming off one of his best years in a while. I was counting on him to be like a 73-74.
We've just got to use our ratings challenges efficiently.
As atleast the PA and SC ratings are directly based on the stats from last season, or atleast the ranking is the same, is there a possibility to challenge them, or is it just a waste of time to look for an argument that the guy has been a consistent scorer/passer for a few years to lift his rating?
Not a waste of time. Reasonable, thorough, well-substantiated arguments will always get a fair shot.
If we are rating defenceman such as Kasparatis at 68, Willie Mitchel at 69 and Aaron Miller at 67. Than 70 OV makes no sense. We should consider lowering the 70 OV requirements.
So, if I understand it correctly, the final SC/PA ratings will in some cases, where a rating is challenged, be based on multiple seasons and in the rest of the cases it will be a 1-year rating?
Goalie rerates are with the admin team for review, and should be posted soon.
FYI, Columbus is away from December 11th to 18th inclusive, scouting prospects on the beaches of Mexico. (At least that's what I'll tell my wife I'm doing... not starting at the bikini-clad hotties at all!).
Doug, I think you mis-spelt staring...
I would like to get Mike Wall, Wade Flaherty,Johan Holmqvist and Fred Brathwaite also rated. They are all part of the Tampa Bay goalie miracle.
Mike Wall was rated last season and is under contract by Tampa Bay?
Mike Wall was rated last season and is under contract by Tampa Bay?
The reason I am asking is why should I pay a players salary if he is not rated? I can accept that Mike Wall goes back to my prospect list and I dont have to pay him anything this season, is that an option? If I have to pay I insist that he gets rated.
The reason I am asking is why should I pay a players salary if he is not rated? I can accept that Mike Wall goes back to my prospect list and I dont have to pay him anything this season, is that an option? If I have to pay I insist that he gets rated.