For all you GSN bashers there ice time was cut way back,no penalties so Greenings and Smiths time was short.And guess what all you real smart hockey guys one of our worse losses.What the heck please fill me in on what your reasons are tonight and please put some thought into this so for once you dont sound like a goof
lehner responsible for two goals against
phillips responsible for two goals against
2+2 = 4
7 (amount of goals they had before the empty netter) - 4 = 3
final score:
4-3 sens. we also had so many opportunities this game that could have gone our way. it was a well played game ruined by awful goaltending and brutal giveaways by phillips.
that line looks good with reduced minutes. not out long enough to make mistakes, just enough to cycle and get some shots. they are an excellent 4th line, and a decent third line. if we could get smith some better line-mates, ones that crash and bang like neil and greening, but are better offensively, we would have a dangerous physical line.
Well, a positive in this game imo was the play of Zibanejad and Hoffman.
Zibanejad was absolutely dynamic. He had 3-4 Karlsson type end-to-end rushes. His shot is lethal and he was using his body.
Zibanejad thrives the more you play him. He's gonna be a beast.
Hoffman will also be a very good NHLer.
yup and yup. also liked what i saw from the mac - turry - ryan line. they're passing it around nicely and attacking with lots of speed. hoffman - zibby - condra is like the second/third line tweener version of macarthur - turris - ryan.
you know i'm a big da costa fan, but where does he fit? zibby is too dang good at center.
michalek - spezza - hemsky
macarthur - turris - ryan
hoffman - zibanejad - stone/condra
greening - smith - neil/condra
maybe:
hoffman - da costa - zibby. i think that line would be good, but zibanejad is sick down the middle. no harm in trying it with the position we're in though. maybe it's time to audition da costa on the wing?