HunterSThompson
[}=[][][][][]
Maybe but with the way these games are going i think 0-0 3OT thriller is alot closer than that.
Oh I agree, which is why I'm predicting the opposite.
Maybe but with the way these games are going i think 0-0 3OT thriller is alot closer than that.
"Must win" and "elimination" are not always the same in sports. It's well-known that there's plenty of allowance for the "must win" label in any game that, if lost, makes things disproportionately or significantly harder. See also: digging a hole, behind the eight ball, etc. None of those terms are taken literally.
Explain to me how many MUST WIN games you get in a best of 7 games series? Calling this a must win game is hype. I always gauge these things by where you are if you lose that must win game.
To me Must Win=Have to Win. Any game they lose, they make it harder for themselves than if they win, but losing game 4 leaves them in a best of 3 series. If he preaches must win and they lose, what does he preach next?
Realistically speaking, the Caps need only make sure the Rangers don't win two games in a row.
Remember early in the year and before the season when everyone was afraid of not having center depth or the ability to win a large amount of faceoffs. Last night Kuzy was our worst faceoff man and he was at 64%. Think center depth went from an extreme concern to extreme depth in one season. On top of that on of our centers has been hurt this series and last. Love it!
Remember early in the year and before the season when everyone was afraid of not having center depth or the ability to win a large amount of faceoffs. Last night Kuzy was our worst faceoff man and he was at 64%. Think center depth went from an extreme concern to extreme depth in one season. On top of that on of our centers has been hurt this series and last. Love it!
I'm so impressed at Kuzy's ability to learn, and learn quickly at that. This kid is going to be special.
Well, I took just the part that supported my position. He also said it was luck. He also said he was trying to wrap it around, which is an odd thing to say considering he didn't even come close to getting his stick around.
I'm still gonna say he was trying to bounce it in off the back of the goalie's leg.
Lets pump the brakes here.
The Rangers are not a good face off team I don't believe. They were sub 50% this year and are like 45% in the playoffs overall.
I'm still gonna say he was trying to bounce it in off the back of the goalie's leg.
They are still rather easily better than Tampa, and about similar as Montreal in terms of playoffs.
The real problem in that regard doesn't come before SCF if Chicago or Anaheim wins the West.
The goal is to instill a sense that EVERY game is "must win" and if you fail you gave it your best shot and the next game is even more winnable because you will find the next gear. If you win then you're one step closer to your goal BUT you don't allow yourself to get complacent. It's not difficult.
I think its high time our 4th line scores, specifically Glencross from Willy
I see. so EVERY game is a must win. I am probably wrong, but the guys posted that trotz had to sell g4 as a must win game couldn't have meant that.
But ok. EVERY game is a must win. Next?
I love all the posters thinking that Fehr will be some sort of savior or even a boon...
You saw the last couple months of the season, right?
If they haven't come after Mike Green, you think they will come after anyone?
Thats not the type of game they play. They don't like hitting, they don't like physicality. Its as finesse a team as it gets. The AV special.
Someone forgot to tell Kreider that. He was impressive last night with his physical game. Hit anyone and anything in sight.
Someone forgot to tell Kreider that. He was impressive last night with his physical game. Hit anyone and anything in sight.