bernmeister
Registered User
I am shocked and dismayed --- more still recovering from the stupidity that was the Talbot trade --- but ok.Poor Bern. This will crush his spirits.
several have tried but nobody crushes bernmeister.
Thanks for the gentle good thought.RIP Bern
Rumors of my demise, despite Slats apparently wanting to give me a heart attack, are greatly exaggerated.
THIS is the guy we should have gotten from BH. Also believe could have been done without surrendering Haggerty.Raanta is very talented and well liked. Didn't get a fair shake in Chicago due to emergence of Darling. He will thrive behind Lundqvist. Will definitely be rooting for him to do well.
No question he has the shot, both sniper and otherwise, and we have videos of him busting a move.Wasn't haggerty going supposed to replace Nash as our 40G sniper?
Room for improvement, need for tutoring and development? yes and yes.
But in a situation where we consider trading Nash [or anyone else, ftm] for best return, Hags 2 was serious possibility. Just needed to learn pro defense, and mature with experience.
Your concern is duly noted/This is literally the WOAT day for bern.
When you live in a world where Boston will eat half Zdeno Chara's contract to take Tanner Glass, the world is bound to be a let-down.
Did he really suggest that?
I believe Boston was also sending a 1st round pick.
Yes, I wanted to do other things to get lots of cap space, then at min extract a 1st, like 14thOA.
I knee haggerty was getting dealt weeks ago.
He asked out during the season. Actually wanted to western Canada.
Nice we got something decent for him.
I wuz unaware of this.
Was this the best we could do, if consideration needed to be made on this new basis to deal him?
btw, this is a real 180 for a kid who chose us, then had such a terrific camp.
Yes, esp in a quality org like Chicago if you can place him and bring him along.Hey guys, is there reason to think haggerty's more than ahl depth?
He no ? can shoot, expect he can make the rest of it work, but that remains to be seen.
You may be rightThose of you who've seen my reports from Hartford know that I wasn't a big fan of Haggerty. He has a great shot, but nothing else. He was so out of place when he had no puck. He'd literally run into teammates at times. He's very, very far from the NHL. If he makes it, will be very good because he has offensive skill, but the odds are against him.
(I may be crazy, oh but I just may be the lunatic you're looking for -- not original put never fails...) --- HOWEVER
that unquestioned talent is in a premium in the NHL.
It will remain to be seen if he makes it, and you can tag this post if ya want.
Haggerty will play not start but hang in / in and out / then when maturing kicks in in a couple of years, he will be a visible and productive asset. MARK MY WORDS.
Sorry to disagree.It isn't an upgrade but it sure as hell makes the Talbot trade look a lot better.
We basically got this guy for free, and Talbot was going to leave after this year anyways.
A 2nd and 3rd round pick for the difference between Talbot and Raanta is a great deal.
I wanted Darling, but Raanta if cheap enough to acquire is not the prob.
But Talbot was given away. see comments below.
Thanks. Nice to know you cared. But like I said, it is the Talbot deal that cuts like a knife.Rather had sign Lindbäck for berns wellbeing. But this is a solid move.
fear notI'm worried about Bern.
Never agreeing to let Talbot walkHow long does Raanta have on his contract?
Wouldn't it have been a better move to keep Haggerty, and keep Talbot for one more season instead of trading him for peanut picks? I'd rather keep Haggerty and let Talbot walk after next season than have this be the final outcome.
What was Haggertys upside? I thought he had 3rd/4th line potential?
*Just read through the thread. Guess Haggerty was a wash. Oh well.
But talbot could have been given a starter's contract / term on Jan 1, and dealt on Jan 2 FOR A LOT MORE.
The nice guy who:
wanted to package Yandle and Talbot for Draisaitl
trade Stepan Brassard and Nash and have Ryan Haggerty replace Nash. He flipped out on someone calling Joe Haggerty an idiot because he thought it was Ryan Haggerty.
Trade Glass for Chara (50% retained) so Chara could play on our 4th line with McIlrath
Thinks Ahti Oksanen would dominate with Kreider and Hayes
have to run now will come back and edit response to this later.
My understanding was that Haggerty had potential bc everyone was very happy when we signed him, and considering the Blackhawks have interest in him there must be something there. Blackhawks don't go after garbage players.
Seems like everyone is down on Haggerty so without me having much knowledge of him I guess it's a good deal. I'm still a bit peeved about the trade we made for Talbot. I thought we could do a lot better. Oh well.
usually the case.
So what does that tell you?
If Hags is SO bad, why did Chicago want him?
no better offers for Raanta?