OT: Raise the Jolly Roger: Uh...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Coastal Kev

There will be "I told you so's" Bet on it
Feb 16, 2013
16,759
5,026
The Low Country, SC
Where's the evidence to Liriano having a bounce back year next season, that everyone and their mother are predicting?

All signs, as Big, myself, and a lot of of stateheads have stated, are pointing to more regression or more of the same level as this year.


Not the main point, simply one end result of the trade that is somewhat plausible.

The Bucs sold 2 prospects that people have varying opinions of for cash. That's it, that's the story, go Bucs.

I and when I say Bucs, I mean BUCKs.
 

JimmyTwoTimes

Registered User
Apr 13, 2010
19,958
5,281
I do think the payroll will be above 120 mil by 2018...they will lock up the young guys like they did with polanco and marte.

But also agree with the people hating the liriano trade. I wanted him gone but didn't think it would take two assets to do so. Actually thought we would get something of value for him. It was obviously a salary dump...because reese and rameriz packaged together(without liriano) could've have gotten more than Hutchison . You move those two guys to at least get a solid rental..not an "all in" type move but more than we've done the past 3 years. Not a typical move from Huntington...maybe they're planning on extending cole. We'll see.
 

Rossi Rat

Registered User
Feb 14, 2016
6,000
2,007
On a lighter note - who do you all see winning the World Series?

To me, it's gonna be the San Fran Giants over the Red Sox. They win a World Series just about every other year, so now is their time again. Posey, Panik, Pence, Brandon Crawfish (remember dat granny in the WC game here? O lawd) superb pitching with MadBum/Cueto. I think it'd be a good series though, BoSox are led by Papi in his final year and have excellent young players Mookie/Xander/JBJ who are better than any Pirates this year AINEC.
 

Winger for Hire

Praise Beebo
Dec 9, 2013
13,058
1,692
Quarantine Zone 5
Not the main point, simply one end result of the trade that is somewhat plausible.

The Bucs sold 2 prospects that people have varying opinions of for cash. That's it, that's the story, go Bucs.

I and when I say Bucs, I mean BUCKs.

I understand your feeling on the trade.

I'm trying to just talk about Liriano by himself and how a lot of people have some weird expectation of him magically reverting back to '13-'15 Liriano despite the league clearly figuring out. Sure, he had a good outing in his first Toronto start, but it was also against the team (KC) that has taken the fewest walks in the entire league. So it's no surprise he was able to go out and toss a nice game against a team that negates one of his biggest flaws.
 

Coastal Kev

There will be "I told you so's" Bet on it
Feb 16, 2013
16,759
5,026
The Low Country, SC
I understand your feeling on the trade.

I'm trying to just talk about Liriano by himself and how a lot of people have some weird expectation of him magically reverting back to '13-'15 Liriano despite the league clearly figuring out. Sure, he had a good outing in his first Toronto start, but it was also against the team (KC) that has taken the fewest walks in the entire league. So it's no surprise he was able to go out and toss a nice game against a team that negates one of his biggest flaws.

I will be honest, I am not currently or have not been in the past following Liriano as closely as you are. So if you are looking for details, I've got nothing.

I'm simply looking at his age and stuff from when I have watched him this year. It doesn't look to me like he lost anything other than his control. Is that from him declining or is it simply a matter of focus? I will concede that Liriano may in fact be done. I still would have preferred the Bucs eat his salary rather than selling 2 prospects. But again, if Frankie does somehow regain his mojo and if either one or maybe both of the prospects grow and shine, this trade will go down as maybe the worst trade in Bucco history.

I thought the days of the ARAM trade were long over when in fact we may have made an even worse deal just last week. It sucks, I'm sour about it, and will remain this way for probably the next decade the same way I did when we traded ARAM.
 

Winger for Hire

Praise Beebo
Dec 9, 2013
13,058
1,692
Quarantine Zone 5
The fact is, and it's been a fact since Day 1 of the Coonley/Huntington change-over, the Pirates are always working on a budget. I'm not debating, or going to debate, the actual number they set for the budget. So by knowing that they are always going to work to their budget, I'd much rather ship out the $13mil (plus whatever was saved this season) than ride it out hoping he decides to change his ways (which he's shown he won't).

I am in agreement, which I've said before, the price to ship him out was too high off the bat, but if they do actually reinvest the money saved then it softens the blow (not totally, still a very high price to pay, but freeing up money to actually use for a budget team is very useful).

As Big said earlier, and I believe I posted an article a couple weeks ago from BP (about pitchers like Liriano failing because the league is becoming more disciplined at the plate), nothing at all has changed about Liriano, his stuff, or his control. He's exactly the same pitcher he was when he came to the Pirates, it's just that his style relies on pitching outside the strike zone and getting whiffs and weak contact from chasing. Hitters all over the league have stopped chasing a lot compared to recent seasons, but Liriano is still trying to get them to chase. Unless he changes his style and mindset, he's not going to get back to where he was.
 

Coastal Kev

There will be "I told you so's" Bet on it
Feb 16, 2013
16,759
5,026
The Low Country, SC
The fact is, and it's been a fact since Day 1 of the Coonley/Huntington change-over, the Pirates are always working on a budget. I'm not debating, or going to debate, the actual number they set for the budget. So by knowing that they are always going to work to their budget, I'd much rather ship out the $13mil (plus whatever was saved this season) than ride it out hoping he decides to change his ways (which he's shown he won't).

I am in agreement, which I've said before, the price to ship him out was too high off the bat, but if they do actually reinvest the money saved then it softens the blow (not totally, still a very high price to pay, but freeing up money to actually use for a budget team is very useful).

As Big said earlier, and I believe I posted an article a couple weeks ago from BP (about pitchers like Liriano failing because the league is becoming more disciplined at the plate), nothing at all has changed about Liriano, his stuff, or his control. He's exactly the same pitcher he was when he came to the Pirates, it's just that his style relies on pitching outside the strike zone and getting whiffs and weak contact from chasing. Hitters all over the league have stopped chasing a lot compared to recent seasons, but Liriano is still trying to get them to chase. Unless he changes his style and mindset, he's not going to get back to where he was.

I hope you end up being right about Liriano and Big is right about Ramirez, that's what would really soften the blow for me in the long run.


Question, why is Bell still in AAA??? I watched him smack another Grand Slammy last night (oops, rbi's are overrated, I keep forgetting that) and he he battled each and every plate appearance? So again, why isn't he in Pittsburgh right now?
 

Winger for Hire

Praise Beebo
Dec 9, 2013
13,058
1,692
Quarantine Zone 5
I hope you end up being right about Liriano and Big is right about Ramirez, that's what would really soften the blow for me in the long run.


Question, why is Bell still in AAA??? I watched him smack another Grand Slammy last night (oops, rbi's are overrated, I keep forgetting that) and he he battled each and every plate appearance? So again, why isn't he in Pittsburgh right now?

The answer is probably defense.. which all sources are saying isn't close to MLB level. Please don't attack me on this one, I'm just reporting what seems to be the reason. I don't necessarily agree 100% on keeping him down because of it, but I understand to a degree.

I think, I have nothing to back this up besides my own gut and reading, the organization is trying their absolute hardest to avoid another Pedro situation where the players completely falls apart because of trouble in the field.

The Pirates could certainly use his bat in the lineup though.
 

Coastal Kev

There will be "I told you so's" Bet on it
Feb 16, 2013
16,759
5,026
The Low Country, SC
So you know that I am most upset about the Bucs losing Ramirez last he week. But in talking about losing one of my favorite prospects for cash, I glossed over the loss of McGuire. Outside of knowing he was a high pick, I don't have much of anything on McGuire to offer. But I heard that the reason we dumped him was concern over his bat, ok.

I decided to take a look back at Cervelli's career in the minors and compare that to McGuire's.

Cervelli looked to be .240 hitter with little to zero power. McGuire this season in AA, .260 hitter with similar comps on power, BB, RBI's and SO.


So someone tell me again why McGuire was considered a declining prospect? Some people may say I'm making way too big of deal about the trade. I have to tell you, the more I look at it, I think there should be massive protests by Pirate fans outside of PNC.
 

Big McLargehuge

Fragile Traveler
May 9, 2002
72,188
7,742
S. Pasadena, CA
The problem when comparing players as prospects is...well...prospects are volatile. Cervelli was a total non-prospect when he signed with the Yankees and had a mild breakout as a 20 year-old that saw him rise through the Yankees system way too quickly (and he still never cracked prospect lists). He made his MLB debut with only 21 games played above A Ball. As a catcher. Throw in a ton of injuries and you can see why he never truly caught on with the Yankees and why his minor numbers don't mean a ton.

That and Cervelli's minor league numbers were better than you make them out to be. He was a .260 hitter with a .706 minor league OPS. So...same basic batting average with a slightly higher OPS for Cervelli...but aside from being aggressively placed right away McGuire has been given full seasons at the different stops in the minors while Cervelli went from non-prospect to the Majors within 2 years.

And, again, minor league stats are ultimately meaningless. Scouts saw untapped potential in Cervelli's bat that nobody has seen in McGuire's. Nobody sees McGuire as a 'declining prospect', he was a kid taken out of Washington (state) high school, meaning he faced an inferior level of competition (unfortunate truth of kids growing up in places with actual seasons), whose bat was always the question mark. He went as highly as he did because his defense profiled so well that any offense would have made him a blue chip prospect. His bat was always his lowest rated tool and there's nothing to look at to say that he's going to break out offensively...but his defense is still elite and he'll be a Major Leaguer because of it...the question is if his offense ever gets good enough to warrant an every day job, or if he'll be a defensive specialist. To be a 'declining prospect' would insinuate he had a hit tool that didn't advance past the low minors...the fact of the matter is he always had a below average hit tool, the hope was that it would develop with age. When you draft an 18 year-old you're drafting ceiling, not floor.

And you damn well know people around here, and around the fan base, are pissed off about him being included in the trade. Nobody likes it, stop painting it like you're the only one who sees the 'truth'. We're all trying to get on with things and you keep picking at the scab. The trade is done, we can't undo it. If you're going to complain this much about something that you can't control...well...

Let me put things this way - if the Pirates made me as angry as they make you...I wouldn't watch. I know this because that's what happened to me post-Aramis trade up until Littlefield was finally fired.

And no, in no way is this trade even remotely comparable. Ramirez was a 25 year-old with 30 HR power that the Bucs didn't want to pay. These guys are prospects that may never make the Majors.



As for Bell...I think the Pirates are completely paranoid with breaking his spirit like what happened with Pedro. His defense is garbage, but I do think they're handling things a little too delicately right now. His bat is ready, it's just the glove that is holding him back and I get the desire to get him in the Majors in the best possible conditions for him to succeed...the defensive reps in AAA are far more meaningful than him riding the bench in Pittsburgh, but at this point he should be starting over Jaso. That said, Freese should be starting over Jaso at this point. Jaso should be riding the bench hardcore for a while. That isn't to say I think Jaso is worthless, it's that he's been ice cold for two months and his defense is replacement level...he's not good enough to keep him in the line-up as frequently as he's been in it lately. At least with McCutchen you have the former MVP argument, but Jaso has always been a platoon player and is set to crush his former career high in plate appearances (404 in 2010...he has 343 this year already).

Hurdle...he is what he is, a relatively poor tactician (aside from being well ahead of the curve when it came to defensive shifts, which the league has caught up to) who is a master motivator. We haven't seen the motivation aspect much this year, which leaves a muddled mess. I won't say that he's managing so poorly that he should be fired, but I also believe managers have shelf lives and Hurdle is in his 6th season in Pittsburgh. His seat is warm right now, but a poor start next year dials up the thermostat greatly. This is a lost season thanks to a multitude of differing factors, but we can't afford a second one in a row next year, Hurdle's fault or not.
 
Last edited:

Coastal Kev

There will be "I told you so's" Bet on it
Feb 16, 2013
16,759
5,026
The Low Country, SC
First, I never once "painted that I was the only one to know the truth", I never carry that type of attitude with any of my posts. I think this is a bit of projection on your part.

Also, if I'm not going to complain about the complete fraud and dishonesty of an organization that I have followed for several decades through thick and thin on a board that's for discussion about said organization, please tell me where I should direct my complaints.

Am I beating a dead horse with this discussion? Who's to say? You? I'm not picking a scab for fun. I have made several attempts to walk away from the discussion but then others here keep making posts with justifications for a trade that should not be defended IMHO. My passion will not let me walk away in the face of blatant lies and failed logic.

Lastly you state "nobody liked it". That is false, or maybe you aren't a subscriber to Pirate Prospects or haven't read others here on this very forum who make the case for the trade.

What happened a week ago wasn't just a questionable baseball trade gone bad. It revealed much more about the organization and what their goals really are, PROFIT.

If NH or Nutting had told me 8 years ago, "Our first priority will always be profit over winning", I would have no room to complain since I would understand what and who I'm supporting.
 

Big McLargehuge

Fragile Traveler
May 9, 2002
72,188
7,742
S. Pasadena, CA
There is one final thing I want to say before I step off this soap box.

This thread exists for a reason. It's not to promote each and every thing the Pirates do, it's to give a 'safe space' to Pirates fans because every time the subject of the Pirates would come up in The Pittsburgher Thread, which was started to be the thread for all non-Penguins sports/teams on this board, it would be drenched in a page of negativity and borderline trolling. Those negative individuals had every right to be furious at the way the Pirates had been run for two decades at that point, but the excessive negativity meant that it was impossible to talk about the Pirates at all on this board. Even the most positive thing would result in a string of posts saying that nothing will ever change. Those people may have been Pirates fans at one point in their lives, but they weren't any more. Again, there's nothing wrong with that...but this thread started as a way for people to be able to talk about the Pirates without layers upon layers of negativity, and a couple of layers of negativity are starting to be established in here.

Nobody that posts in this thread is a rah-rah cheerleader who believes everything the Pirates do is right...but there's a difference between being critical and commandeering the conversation. There's a reason I barely talk about the Penguins on this board any more, it stopped being enjoyable when the negativity became the status quo.

I'm not saying everyone has to pull the 'We Happy Few' act and pretend that everything is awesome, when in reality this season is pretty analogous to that opening (link with a gore warning for those unfamiliar with the reference)...but the tone of this thread is getting too doom and gloom for what was intended. I'm critical of this team at times, I expect everyone to, but when doom & gloom becomes the tenor of the conversation, this stops being a discussion about a sports team that we all love and instead turns into a chore to be dealt with.

edit: Read your post. What happens on the Pirates Prospects boards happened there, not here. On this board there are no vocal proponents of the trade, this is a soap box issue where you will find no opposition here. That's what makes it so painful to me to slog through, you're arguing something that nobody is arguing in favor of, we just disagree on the level of insanity.

At the end of the day this is a trade that can't be judged for the here and now, it can only be judged when we see a.) what the Pirates do with that prized 'financial flexibility' (which I'm as sick of hearing about as anyone else is) and b.) what the prospects and Hutchison do. If Hutchison turns into a solid #3/4, Liriano posts a 5 run ERA again next year, Ramirez ends up closer to my projection of him than yours (4th outfielder with a .300 batting average but low slugging percentage) and McGuire's bat never comes around...

That's a lot of things that have to go right for the Pirates, but there is a way we win this trade. This isn't trading off an established 25 year-old star for spare parts because his arbitration numbers are getting a little too high. At the end of the day I think our only major disagreement is that I believe that the Liriano money will be spent elsewhere, while you seem to think that it's just going into Nutting's pocket. They've lost your trust, and I get that. For me I still say there's a big difference between the way Robert runs the team and the way his awful miser of a father ran the team. G. Ogden was all about profit, and Robert...well he's mostly about profit, but he has shown a willingness to spend money on things that the average fan doesn't see, such as facilities, the draft (before MLB closed that off for us), etc. Robert will lose my trust when we lose an good, established youngster because we don't want to pay him what he's worth. That wasn't Walker, who isn't worth what he's going to make. That won't be Cole, who would be testing free agency no matter how many dump trucks of money the owner had (see: Greinke). That could have been McCutchen, but at this point I don't think anyone wants him around long-term. Marte & Polanco are already locked up through their primes, so we shall see. Personally I found the fact that the Bucs paid Cervelli to be very refreshing because we are not far from players of his caliber simply being replaced by the next reclamation project to hit the market. Our budget should be higher, but the way to do that isn't by signing Ian Kennedy for $50 million more than he's worth, as the market set last year.

The big issue with this year's team is that Huntington went into last off-season with a plan...and the market seemed to take him completely by surprise and he lacked a back-up solution. Hopefully he learns from that mistake and is more proactive this off-season. A repeat of that off-season is the sign to me that he's not the right man to carry a team from rebuild to contender. I think we'll see a very proactive Huntington this off-season.
 
Last edited:

Gallatin

A Banksy of Goonism
Mar 4, 2010
2,951
541
Pittsburgh
There is one final thing I want to say before I step off this soap box.

This thread exists for a reason. It's not to promote each and every thing the Pirates do, it's to give a 'safe space' to Pirates fans because every time the subject of the Pirates would come up in The Pittsburgher Thread, which was started to be the thread for all non-Penguins sports/teams on this board, it would be drenched in a page of negativity and borderline trolling. Those negative individuals had every right to be furious at the way the Pirates had been run for two decades at that point, but the excessive negativity meant that it was impossible to talk about the Pirates at all on this board. Even the most positive thing would result in a string of posts saying that nothing will ever change. Those people may have been Pirates fans at one point in their lives, but they weren't any more. Again, there's nothing wrong with that...but this thread started as a way for people to be able to talk about the Pirates without layers upon layers of negativity, and a couple of layers of negativity are starting to be established in here.

Nobody that posts in this thread is a rah-rah cheerleader who believes everything the Pirates do is right...but there's a difference between being critical and commandeering the conversation. There's a reason I barely talk about the Penguins on this board any more, it stopped being enjoyable when the negativity became the status quo.

I'm not saying everyone has to pull the 'We Happy Few' act and pretend that everything is awesome, when in reality this season is pretty analogous to that opening (link with a gore warning for those unfamiliar with the reference)...but the tone of this thread is getting too doom and gloom for what was intended. I'm critical of this team at times, I expect everyone to, but when doom & gloom becomes the tenor of the conversation, this stops being a discussion about a sports team that we all love and instead turns into a chore to be dealt with.

edit: Read your post. What happens on the Pirates Prospects boards happened there, not here. On this board there are no vocal proponents of the trade, this is a soap box issue where you will find no opposition here. That's what makes it so painful to me to slog through, you're arguing something that nobody is arguing in favor of, we just disagree on the level of insanity.

At the end of the day this is a trade that can't be judged for the here and now, it can only be judged when we see a.) what the Pirates do with that prized 'financial flexibility' (which I'm as sick of hearing about as anyone else is) and b.) what the prospects and Hutchison do. If Hutchison turns into a solid #3/4, Liriano posts a 5 run ERA again next year, Ramirez ends up closer to my projection of him than yours (4th outfielder with a .300 batting average but low slugging percentage) and McGuire's bat never comes around...

That's a lot of things that have to go right for the Pirates, but there is a way we win this trade. This isn't trading off an established 25 year-old star for spare parts because his arbitration numbers are getting a little too high. At the end of the day I think our only major disagreement is that I believe that the Liriano money will be spent elsewhere, while you seem to think that it's just going into Nutting's pocket. They've lost your trust, and I get that. For me I still say there's a big difference between the way Robert runs the team and the way his awful miser of a father ran the team. G. Ogden was all about profit, and Robert...well he's mostly about profit, but he has shown a willingness to spend money on things that the average fan doesn't see, such as facilities, the draft (before MLB closed that off for us), etc. Robert will lose my trust when we lose an good, established youngster because we don't want to pay him what he's worth. That wasn't Walker, who isn't worth what he's going to make. That won't be Cole, who would be testing free agency no matter how many dump trucks of money the owner had (see: Greinke). That could have been McCutchen, but at this point I don't think anyone wants him around long-term. Marte & Polanco are already locked up through their primes, so we shall see. Personally I found the fact that the Bucs paid Cervelli to be very refreshing because we are not far from players of his caliber simply being replaced by the next reclamation project to hit the market. Our budget should be higher, but the way to do that isn't by signing Ian Kennedy for $50 million more than he's worth, as the market set last year.

The big issue with this year's team is that Huntington went into last off-season with a plan...and the market seemed to take him completely by surprise and he lacked a back-up solution. Hopefully he learns from that mistake and is more proactive this off-season. A repeat of that off-season is the sign to me that he's not the right man to carry a team from rebuild to contender. I think we'll see a very proactive Huntington this off-season.

Who da man? You da man.
 

Return of the Paek

Registered User
Jun 19, 2016
771
660
Excuse me while I bang my head on this wall for the next 10 minutes.

Sorry Big, couldnt resist. I enjoyed your post FWIW. Anyway, my phone auto-corrected SRod as Sword recently. I think that would be a great nickname for SRod. It makes no sense, but I find it funny.

One thing I don't get is why Sword doesn't get more starts at 2nd?
 

Big McLargehuge

Fragile Traveler
May 9, 2002
72,188
7,742
S. Pasadena, CA
Sword :laugh:

If he didn't already have a perfect nickname (Serpico), I'd be way too in favor of everyone just randomly calling him Sword from now on.

Anyway...it is a bit odd, especially since Sword has still played 2B more than any other position in the Majors...but he's gotten way more play at 1B and the outfield for us. Last year that made more sense, but it seems like it'd be easier to plug him in there more frequently this year.
 

Winger for Hire

Praise Beebo
Dec 9, 2013
13,058
1,692
Quarantine Zone 5
Looks like Hurdle fell on his Sword in the dugout.

McCutchen looks to have collided with Sword in the outfield. Cutch caught Sword right in the midsection.

OK, it checks out as a usable nickname.
 

PensandCaps

Beddy Tlueger
May 22, 2015
27,648
18,022
Shouldve never traded dickerson for that bum deker. Also, cutch sucks. Marte should be in CF.


2-0

Shouldve been over and 0-0 but cutch cant play defense anymore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad