DJ Spinoza
Registered User
- Aug 7, 2003
- 25,437
- 3,932
Yeah, and a quick glance at Locke shows a lot more variance than what we've seen from Williams. Granted, Williams is outperforming the underlying stats, but I think even assuming regression, he's a good middle of the rotation cog. I think his control is a lot more sharp that Locke's -- earlier in the season, it seemed to me like he was trying to sell out more to get better K numbers, but the resulting increase in BBs isn't worth it for his style of pitching. He needs to keep runners off the bases, and BABIP will only help so much in that regard.
More vaguely, I've just never had much of the same feel watching Williams as I did with Locke, and I think there was a stretch of that season where Locke was just plain old pitching well for a decent stretch. Maybe Williams is about the same, but I think he's been a useful asset to have around from day 1.
More vaguely, I've just never had much of the same feel watching Williams as I did with Locke, and I think there was a stretch of that season where Locke was just plain old pitching well for a decent stretch. Maybe Williams is about the same, but I think he's been a useful asset to have around from day 1.