Motte and Bailey
Registered User
- Jun 21, 2017
- 3,692
- 1,556
The draft rankings that are publicly available need to be knocked down a few pegs, they’re given far too much undue credence when evaluating a whether a pick was good or bad.
A really dumb trope that gets repeated as nauseum here is to always draft BPA no matter what with high 1st round picks. You realize this means in 2018 on draft day you would’ve preferred to get Zadina over Hughes? Ridiculous. Even if Zadina becomes a star PPG winger and equal in value he would not have made our team better than Hughes did because Hughes filled the way way way more important positional need. Hughes transformed our entire play style on the backend by himself as a rookie. The BPA trope fails hard here and again all the time.
This BPA trope conveniently reinforces ‘Benning is bad’ because it essentially judges a GM based on how closely his picks line up with Bob McKenzie’s list. Think about that for a second.
That means if a GM takes a real risk on a prospect in the top 10 of the draft and it turns out he was right and it pays off any of the many differing scouting agencies or media talking heads can have that player ranked around where he was taken in the mountain of pre-draft mocks and then that invalidates all of the work/effort and credit that deserves recognition? That’s bullcrap. Total bull crap.
A really dumb trope that gets repeated as nauseum here is to always draft BPA no matter what with high 1st round picks. You realize this means in 2018 on draft day you would’ve preferred to get Zadina over Hughes? Ridiculous. Even if Zadina becomes a star PPG winger and equal in value he would not have made our team better than Hughes did because Hughes filled the way way way more important positional need. Hughes transformed our entire play style on the backend by himself as a rookie. The BPA trope fails hard here and again all the time.
This BPA trope conveniently reinforces ‘Benning is bad’ because it essentially judges a GM based on how closely his picks line up with Bob McKenzie’s list. Think about that for a second.
That means if a GM takes a real risk on a prospect in the top 10 of the draft and it turns out he was right and it pays off any of the many differing scouting agencies or media talking heads can have that player ranked around where he was taken in the mountain of pre-draft mocks and then that invalidates all of the work/effort and credit that deserves recognition? That’s bullcrap. Total bull crap.
Last edited: