YP44
Registered User
I'm trying to be realistic here. Quick is a luxury for Calgary not a necessity. LA would have to take back some long term salary. Neal matches Quick salary and term very well and Neal can still be productive. Maybe they'd give Jankowski or Bennett in the deal but the 1st goes away.
I get that what I put is not realistic from a flames POV but from a Kings it would be more valuable to find a trading partner where they do not have to take a longterm +30 contract back.