QOs not given to Pitlick, Clague and Brook
It also means that they are free to sign with whomever they likeWhich doesn't mean they won't be signed. Clague and Brook, whatever. Pitlick, I'd still like to see signed.
Wow...no Rem?
It also means that they are free to sign with whomever they like
He's also been on waivers twice before. Not like he has much value around the league, otherwise would've been tradedNot that surprising. Good offensive season for an undersized player on the back of really unsustainable percentages. He was a prime overpay candidate.
Hope they sign Pitlick too.Which doesn't mean they won't be signed. Clague and Brook, whatever. Pitlick, I'd still like to see signed.
Correct. Just pointing out that because he wasn't qualified doesn't automatically mean they can't come to an agreement.
I think Pitlick also has Arbitration Rights.
Have to think they were not confident with arbitration vs real valueSurprised on Montembeault.....and surprised they didn't put one for Pitlick
Not that surprising. Good offensive season for an undersized player on the back of really unsustainable percentages. He was a prime overpay candidate.
Yeah, otherwise I don't get the logic in keeping him after the deadline if they never intended on retaining him afterwards.He's also been on waivers twice before. Not like he has much value around the league, otherwise would've been traded
I wasn't a huge fan this season; bottom 6 player who is very replaceable
Have to think they were not confident with arbitration vs real value
Too bad for Rem. Habs have too many forwards under contract. If they did not had to take Dadonov for Weber's contract, maybe it would had opened a job for him.QOs not given to Pitlick, Clague and Brook
They are UFAs
Really curious how the figures end up on Dach's contract.