Put a massive athlete on skates

JuniorNelson

Registered User
Jan 21, 2010
8,631
320
E.Vancouver
Chara is about as big as you can go in hockey and he is a scrawny boy in the upper body. If he did build up he'd be over three hundred pounds. If he built twenty inch biceps and a fifty six chest he'd immobilize himself. He wouldn't be able to maneuver. He'd have to stop to turn. It happened to Brent Sopel. He did serious weights one Summer and came to camp thirty pounds over weight and unable to skate.
 

jbobell98

Registered User
Dec 14, 2017
636
429
The NHL is a game of skill and first step speed. Giants of the kind 6'8 and up with their long limbs just dont have the coordination and first step to dominate the NHL. Its simple physics really, their body limits how fast they can turn and make those first few strides. This isnt basketball where 70% of the game relies on height.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eazy for Kuzy

Alexander the Gr8

Registered User
May 2, 2013
31,814
13,129
Toronto
Remember Evgeny Artyukhin? Massive human being, 6'5 260 lbs, couldn't skate or stickhandle to save his life.
I don't think there is much to gain from being that tall and that heavy.

Look at this uncoordinated giant compared to the swift and skilled David Perron. David vs Goliath in this picture

Evgeny+Artyukhin+St+Louis+Blues+v+Anaheim+HC6adzf3cTYl.jpg
 

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Oct 23, 2014
28,604
40,198
Athleticism doesn't translate into skating ability. Elite skating ability takes years upon years and thousands upon thousands of skates to forge the muscle memory behind it.
 

GeeoffBrown

Registered User
Jul 6, 2007
6,080
4,046
I think a guy like Shaq would dominate whatever sport he set his mind to at a young age. It just happened to be basketball.
 

TheJadePipe

Registered User
Mar 8, 2016
1,094
858
Guys, JJ Watt wouldn't be 290lbs if he played pro hockey. He'd be a monster for sure but you couldn't supply enough oxygen to such a muscle mass in a hockey game. He'd be completely gassed very early every game on if he carried that size in the NHL.
Wrong, Watt is a freak athlete... tons of stamina..
I think thier 4th quarter drills are brutal
 

Rygu

Registered User
Dec 24, 2017
1,481
2,328
B.C.
I realize this thread is in good fun, but yes ,skating is essential. Also, I've always felt Chara was an anomaly.

Oh he is, he's still the biggest player in the league at 41, and still among the best conditioned players in the league. He's as freakish as Watt, just not 6'5 290lbs like Watt.
 

Kane One

Moderator
Feb 6, 2010
43,340
10,996
Brooklyn, New NY
Throw a sumo wrestler in net and have him just stand there
I think Sports Science or whatever the show is named debunked this. The heaviest person in the world I think would take up 80% of the net, maybe it was higher. They'd be completely clueless against shots in any open area.
 

wej20

Registered User
Aug 14, 2008
27,979
1,948
UK
Remember Evgeny Artyukhin? Massive human being, 6'5 260 lbs, couldn't skate or stickhandle to save his life.
I don't think there is much to gain from being that tall and that heavy.

Look at this uncoordinated giant compared to the swift and skilled David Perron. David vs Goliath in this picture

Evgeny+Artyukhin+St+Louis+Blues+v+Anaheim+HC6adzf3cTYl.jpg

Wasn't Artyukhin's whole deal that he could actually move pretty fast once he got up to speed? So could occasionally land a big hit on the forecheck but was pretty much useless everywhere else? If he was making David Perron look swift then he must have been slower than I remember.
 

Roof Daddy

Registered User
Apr 1, 2008
13,131
2,281
Came here to say JJ, but for amusement's sake, I'll pick a player from the other major sports and focus on the athlete portion more than size.

MLB - Shohei Ohtani
Dude can do everything in that sport, why not hockey. Seems like the type who'd be good at anything he tried.

NBA - Russel Westbrook
Crazy athleticism and a motor that doesn't stop. And he's got the type of edge where he could be a Marchand type.

NFL - Marshawn Lynch
Mainly because I want to see him fill a water bottle with Skittles. And in his prime the guy was impossible to take down, does all his damage after contact.
 

Alexander the Gr8

Registered User
May 2, 2013
31,814
13,129
Toronto
Wasn't Artyukhin's whole deal that he could actually move pretty fast once he got up to speed? So could occasionally land a big hit on the forecheck but was pretty much useless everywhere else? If he was making David Perron look swift then he must have been slower than I remember.

He used to be quite fast, that's correct, I actually forgot how fast he was. I'm just biased from having watched so many games of him in the KHL being a slow and useless goon. There's a huge difference in agility.

Watch Perron turn with the puck on his stick, he can turn on a dime. Artyukhin needs as much space to turn as a fully loaded 18 wheeler.
 

Seanaconda

Registered User
May 6, 2016
9,579
3,330
Athleticism doesn't translate into skating ability. Elite skating ability takes years upon years and thousands upon thousands of skates to forge the muscle memory behind it.
Pretty sure the assumption would be having these guys take up hockey as kids
 

me2

Go ahead foot
Jun 28, 2002
37,903
5,595
Make my day.
Jonah Lomu - Wikipedia
a 196cm tall and 120 kg monster athlete that could run 100meters in 10,8 seconds.

The famed Lomu J95. Devolped by NZ in response to a French incursion which sank the NZ navy in 1985. Field tested in 1995 trials, it proved almost unstoppable. The well regarded English Catt defensive system proved to be entirely useless against it. Sadly decommissioned now (RIP), rendering NZ vulnerable aginst anyone with a sharp stick and notning better to do on the weekend.

---------------

The reverse hits would be brutal. No sane Dman would want to go into corners on a dump in.
 

Gene Parmesan

Dedicated to babies who came feet first
Jul 23, 2009
84,758
2,406
California
Wrong, Watt is a freak athlete... tons of stamina..
I think thier 4th quarter drills are brutal

Watt hardly comes out of games and plays defensive end and defensive tackle depending on the front. Every play is a fist fight/wrestling match with another huge human.
 

Beville

#ForTheBoys
Mar 4, 2011
8,639
1,391
Engerlanddd!
I think Sports Science or whatever the show is named debunked this. The heaviest person in the world I think would take up 80% of the net, maybe it was higher. They'd be completely clueless against shots in any open area.
I put the video on this very page.
 

RoyalDoubleMcCheesie

Registered User
Aug 31, 2008
433
403
I dunno if gronk would be good he seems injured prone for the NFL. Didn' he break the same arm twice or something? And the injury he suffered this year he might call it quits?
 

TheJadePipe

Registered User
Mar 8, 2016
1,094
858
I dunno if gronk would be good he seems injured prone for the NFL. Didn' he break the same arm twice or something? And the injury he suffered this year he might call it quits?
Football is far more physical than hockey, not even in the same realm.... it’s why they only can play 16 games per season...
 

Acallabeth

Post approved by Ovechkin
Jul 30, 2011
9,998
1,426
Moscow
Hockey is the game of skill, teamplay and intelligence. Being a freak athlete obviously helps in any sport, but gives a lot less advantage in hockey than in American football or basketball. Even regarding a shot, look at Panarin or Ellis who have great shots despite being pretty small and short. Also, said athlete would need to spend years to develop any kind of skill that would allow him in the NHL instead of working on his massive muscles, which would limit him anyway.
 

hambone1818

Registered User
Feb 6, 2009
879
54
North 'Merica
Fun thread discussion.

The speed of the game would eat up larger athletes, especially today with how the game is played. Chara's actually a good example, his stamina is legendary and he's an insane athlete but even at his lighter (relative) weight he can barely keep up with the speed of today's game. Someone like Watt, given elite skating ability, would be a Lindros-esque dominant player for sure but he'd be a bit of a lumbering mass on the ice compared to the smaller players. Now, he'd be able to bowl over guys on the ice and I'd love to see him lay into someone in open ice, but I'd imagine he'd have a tough time controlling the puck. I think of the best stick handlers and they tend to be shorter, quicker guys, a huge 6'9" Watt type player just wouldn't be good with the puck.

As a stay at home defenseman? I think he'd be real effective, and he'd be the ultimate enforcer type. But I don't think he'd make a good forward, and goalie is out just because it's all about quick-twitch response and flexibility, more muscle mass does absolutely nothing for that position.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad