Avsboy
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2006
- 32,243
- 16,657
Looks fine to me
Do you mean fine as in "damn, he's fine", or do you mean "he's aight"?
He gives me weasel vibes but he's not at like a mark stone level.Holy this guy is uglier than f**k.
You let Cogliano rest as long as he wants.I don't know how you can keep Tufte off the 4th line. I like his game.
Veteran spots which I dislike the politics, but it is what it is. Remember that year when we should've sold all the ageing blokes but Sakic said it was "his players" so he'll just keep them? Tufte has done enough to make the team easily, but he ain't beating out Cogs or O'Connor since Bednar already knows them and has them high as Stanley Cup winners.I don't know how you can keep Tufte off the 4th line. I like his game.
Not everyone can be as pretty as ERodHoly this guy is uglier than f**k.
That was and is enjoyable.Holy this guy is uglier than f**k.
MacDermid would definitely get claimed if put on waivers. There are always GM's wanting to beef up their lineup.I think if Tufte proves he can hang that changes the Avs mind. Not sure if he drops the mitts but he's fits the role of big physical presence. They've clearly soured on him a bit, moving him to F. No one will claim him so they can still waive him in Colorado/close contact with the big club and first injury call-up
MacDermid would definitely get claimed if put on waivers. There are always GM's wanting to beef up their lineup.
That would be greatMacDermid would definitely get claimed if put on waivers. There are always GM's wanting to beef up their lineup.
I like Dermy, but we're in cap hell now. He's a luxury we can no longer afford.MacD is good for the locker room
I agree.I like Dermy, but we're in cap hell now. He's a luxury we can no longer afford.
Who cares. If losing Macdermid affects the locker that much than there are far bigger problems with this team.MacD is good for the locker room
MacD is good for the locker room