BAM
Registered User
- Nov 21, 2016
- 4,048
- 2,299
Nylander + Zaitsev/Gardiner + 2019 1st for Subban
Even? What needs to be changed?
Even? What needs to be changed?
Thats more than the offers for EK........Caaahraaazy!Nylander + Zaitsev/Gardiner + 2019 1st for Subban
Even? What needs to be changed?
Drop Zaitsev Replace Nylander with Marner and they might consider it.Nylander + Zaitsev/Gardiner + 2019 1st for Subban
Even? What needs to be changed?
Marner, Tavares, Matthews and Rielly are off the tableDrop Zaitsev Replace Nylander with Marner and they might consider it.
Jeeze that D looks terrible.. hopefully the offense just doesn't allow the other team to get the puck.Leafs are scary because they are tough to match up against up front. No need to change that like Edmonton tried to do by trading Hall and Eberle..they were no longer scary up front and failed to improve defensively when the dust settled.
Also, no team is trading a good RD unless it’s an overpayment.
Rielly Zaitsev
Gardiner Hainsey
Dermott _____*
Rosen
Borgman
Marincin
*Carrick (25 games)
Holl (15 games)
Ozhiganov (10 games)
Liljegren (10 games)
Why not see what we have? There are 60 games up until the trade deadline; make a decision/assessment without guessing of what these guys can do after game ~60.
Do people realize we did this with the LD last year and found out we have Dermott and Borgman who can play in our top 6 moving forward?
Yup and it’s a work in progress. Manson and Montour weren’t always the pretty picks...Jeeze that D looks terrible.. hopefully the offense just doesn't allow the other team to get the puck.
Cept we had Theodore Vatanen Fowler despres Lindholm around themYup and it’s a work in progress. Manson and Montour weren’t always the pretty picks...
Marner, Tavares, Matthews and Rielly are off the table
What’s your point?Cept we had Theodore Vatanen Fowler despres Lindholm around them
What’s your point?
You are grossly underrating Nylander. His value alone is smiliar to the almost 30 year old subbanLeafs already has limited cap space they can’t absorb Subban’s $9M salary without moving another high priced player. Preds can get a better deal than a Nylander + 1st + cap dump.
This is such a poorly researched trade, neither team will accept.
Then so is Subban. Hes arguably their best defender and theyre're trying to win a cup. They arent moving him unless they are clearly winning the trade, and unless one of them is in it, they arent.
Its not really a comparable situation.What’s your point?
Gonna go on a limb and assume its "they already had a good d core, so they could afford to let the not so pretty picks develop".
+ a 7th? rounder?Marner+ would be the basis of a Subban deal
We have a good forward group and LD situation. We can afford to let these guys develop in the AHL and NHL and reassess at the deadline. These guys are pretty much NHL ready. Also Anaheim was a contender and developed Fowler Lindholm Vaatanen Montour Manson while being a contender. It’s not a new concept.
Josi is their best D-man, Subban isn'tThen so is Subban. Hes arguably their best defender and theyre're trying to win a cup. They arent moving him unless they are clearly winning the trade, and unless one of them is in it, they arent.
Cup contenders trade Norris Trophy winning defensemen for scraps all the time! What are you talking about?Then so is Subban. Hes arguably their best defender and theyre're trying to win a cup. They arent moving him unless they are clearly winning the trade, and unless one of them is in it, they arent.
Nylander and a 1st are scraps? Might wanna watch some more hockeyCup contenders trade Norris Trophy winning defensemen for scraps all the time! What are you talking about?
Josi is their best D-man, Subban isn't
Compared to Subban? YeahNylander and a 1st are scraps? Might wanna watch some more hockey
What needs to be changed?