- Dec 6, 2011
- 12,351
- 39,332
The most important thing to remember about last night is to not take away way too much, lest we forget preseason superstar Julien Gauthier and preseason dud Martin Necas.
-The Staal and Aho lines not as much.
Least Jaccob Slavin-like goal against I can remember seeing. 99 out of 100 times Slavin is stick checking the puck to diffuse a rush
Please don't. They just reported that they have done a new Finnish translation of the New Testamony with some established words substituted with new ones.Wilson must've said something to rile him up, like the New American Standard bible is preferable to the New International Version
You are right. The sat line did look solid. I just think that Svech is not the best fit for Aho and Teuvo. I liked more Svech with Trocheck (can't remember the right spelling hehe) and I would put Williams with them. . Or Necas should he return. There are players who are top players which simply can't play up to their full potential with each other. I sadly think this is the case wilh Svech and the two Finns. Leave Aho and Teuvo together and find two good and skilled forwards for Svech.The very first shift SAT looked great—and I thought they were solid all game. The goals came against their line, but mostly due to the blue line struggling. I would keep them together against NYR.
I mentioned I re-watched several Feb/March games last week. Slavin was struggling. In the Vegas game Paccioretty beat him in a puck battle then gets position in front of the net for the first goal. In the Flyers game Slavin allowed not one but two uncontested shots that resulted in the first goal. In the Penguins game he was part of a missed assignment during a line change, which ended in the first goal.
All the partner changes appear to be causing problems. The good news is he and Vatanen should get comfortable quickly.
A lot of coaches subscribe to the “pairings” concept with their forward lines, two guys who work well together and someone else who works hard and gets them the puck. It was worth trying Svech with them because at the time we were a one line team offensively. Adding Trochek allows us to create more pairings. They used Svech with Trochek and it looked pretty good. Maybe Necas and Svech are a pairing and Trochek can be the “other guy”. He can get them the puck, win draws, bury chances when he gets them since he’s a shooter.You are right. The sat line did look solid. I just think that Svech is not the best fit for Aho and Teuvo. I liked more Svech with Trocheck (can't remember the right spelling hehe) and I would put Williams with them. . Or Necas should he return. There are players who are top players which simply can't play up to their full potential with each other. I sadly think this is the case wilh Svech and the two Finns. Leave Aho and Teuvo together and find two good and skilled forwards for Svech.
Nino - Aho -TTYou are right. The sat line did look solid. I just think that Svech is not the best fit for Aho and Teuvo. I liked more Svech with Trocheck (can't remember the right spelling hehe) and I would put Williams with them. . Or Necas should he return. There are players who are top players which simply can't play up to their full potential with each other. I sadly think this is the case wilh Svech and the two Finns. Leave Aho and Teuvo together and find two good and skilled forwards for Svech.
Sounds like a great partyPlease don't. They just reported that they have done a new Finnish translation of the New Testamony with some established words substituted with new ones.
The headline of the news article was: "Righteousness disappears, there's less of mercy, and harlots become whores"
As for Vats, I think it's a pipe dream, would he really want to sign here to be 3RD? We CAN'T piss Pesce off again and put him at 3RD. Unless the thought is do a Pesce - Vats 2nd line, which would be awesome...but then you have Skjei/Gardiner/Fleury on the 3rd pair...which is fine, but expensive. Skjei/Gardiner - Fleury and kill the leftover man? McKeown or Bean as #7? Maybe you can do that for 1-2 years, but you gotta think Vats @ 29 is looking for a 4-5 year deal minimum. Unless we're 100% planning on saying goodbye Doogie, but we don't have anyone on the back-end to replace his offense unless we're going for committee from Skjei/Gards/Bean?
There's a lot working against Vatanen this offseason. The cap will be flat. He's coming off an injury plagued year. Most importantly, the UFA RD crop is as strong as I can ever remember it being. Pietrangelo is the headliner, but there's Barrie, Schultz, Hamonic, Brodie, Tanev and potentially even Byfuglien behind him. Barring a revelatory playoff run, Vatanen is ripe to get squeezed. There are things to like here, even if it's a 3rd pairing role: presence of countrymen Aho and Teravainen, competitive team and PP time that should help him put up numbers in advance of a UFA date with more favorable conditions.
I'm skeptical that they can make the cap work beyond next season, though. Getting out of Gardiner's contract clean seems rather optimistic under the circumstances.
The optics for that will change according to whom NYR will pick with the pick (and according to who would be available). It may well be that ours or TORs 1st will be a very late pick, which will retroactively make Skjei's price look tolerable.I'd rather move Skjei, actually. Can't see that happening after paying the first, but he's more expensive and seems worse. At least Gardiner seems competent in the offensive zone.
In all fairness, I didn't know we scored either...nobody on the ice really reacted all that much until seconds later, which is about when he noticed as well. I agree I think he did a pretty decent job, no Forslund but miles ahead of Shaya. He definitely needs to work on adding some excitement and at times he seemed almost out of breath trying to keep up with the play (will take some time to learn the nuance of describing plays without over-describing and falling behind). He's following the best in the business IMO, so he's never going to live up to that, but he's at a good starting point and I think could develop into a pretty solid pbp guy.My biggest concern, which I had prior to this game, is their inability to quickly get team defense clicking. Skjei and Eddy magnify that issue.
Side note: like others, I was pleasantly surprised by the big rig. I've never been a fan of the guy, but he did a pretty solid job. Only gripes were how frequently he messed up player names and his inability to tell when a goal is scored. But him watching it on TV probably makes it really tough. It's also unfair to compare the guy to Forslund.
I actually like the SAT line. Teams like the Bruins and Avs load up their top lines and it seems to work fine. Spreading out the talent is a good idea in theory but in practice it's not always the optimal move.
Obviously you need depth scoring to win a Cup, but I wasn't really talking about that. I just feel like loading up on the top line will get the most of out of our 3 best forwards. The tradeoff of spreading the talent around could be less production out of Svech to get slightly more production out of the Staal/Trocheck lines. I hate the idea of Svech with Staal and the only other option is Trocheck but I don't think his style meshes well with Svech (and to be honest, other than maybe 2-3 games so far I haven't really been too impressed with him).The Bruins only get away with it because of an elite team defense and PP, neither of which the Canes have. 5v5, the Bruins were 17th in GF this season (Link).
Colorado hasn't won anything yet. Of the teams that have achieved success at the highest level post-lockout, there's been some semblance of balance of the top end skill across the board. Detroit is the closest example of loading up (Datyuk + Zetterberg), but that was the postseason in which Franzen went crazy on a separate line.