I know rt will disagree but I want a small + with Reinhart. This is a franchise defining trade.
Let's say the Blue Jackets want Hanifin and the Coyotes want him too but also covet Provorov. Maybe they draft Hanifin with a handshake deal in place that if their guy (Provorov) is available at 8, they will trade Hanifin to Columbus for Wennberg and #8 overall? Of course the problem is I'm not sure it's likely for Provorov to be available at #8.
I think Couturier + 7 is easily the best option of those presented, especially when you compare it to Reinhart straight up.
I didn't realize drouin was a center, I would've voted him too. I'd probably still prefer strome over most of them but eh.
Wasn't there speculation that TB offered Drouin for Ekblad at last year's draft?
I don't know, DM has been talking a lot about high skill, fast skating, etc. and I don't think Couturier fits that mold. IMO he's a Hanzal clone and while I love Hanzal, I don't want them giving up the #3 overall pick for that type of player.It definitely gives pause. I'm not sure Philly would go there, though. One of Hanifin or Provorov will probably be there. If not, there's Werenski.
Exactly. Why have they soured on him so much this early in his career?!The apparent buyer's remorse freaks me out. They could've had Seth Jones and chose Drouin. So why now flip him for Ekblad or Hanifin? Makes me nervous that there could be something not related to hockey.
I don't know, DM has been talking a lot about high skill, fast skating, etc. and I don't think Couturier fits that mold. IMO he's a Hanzal clone and while I love Hanzal, I don't want them giving up the #3 overall pick for that type of player.
I don't know, DM has been talking a lot about high skill, fast skating, etc. and I don't think Couturier fits that mold. IMO he's a Hanzal clone and while I love Hanzal, I don't want them giving up the #3 overall pick for that type of player.
I'd love two Hanzals but not at the expense of the #3 overall pick. The only way this makes sense IMO is if the Coyotes view Hanifin and Provorov as 1A and 1B and they already know they're not taking Strome or Marner. If that's the case then yeah it makes sense to add Couturier and then just pick up Provorov (gambling that he'll be there). If they're throwing in the towel on a chance at a 1C, this is probably the best way to do it.Couturier is the best 2C on the table (theoretically) so far, UFA or trade. I doubt it ever gets offered, but if it did, Maloney would be foolish to pass it up. Still only 22 and drawing the toughest matchups plus being misused offensively. What's better than Hanzal? Two Hanzals. For a handful of spots? slam effin dunk.
I just got a terribly sick feeling. Former Kitchener Ranger and Coyotes darling of his draft year Jeff Skinner is on the table. He fits Maloney's age requirement. Oh. My. God. I could TOTALLY see Maloney doing something stupid, here. Holy ****. What if we trade #3 for Skinner and minor pieces? Ugh. I could see tossing Gormely in just because the Coyotes inexplicably hate him for no reason. Skinner and a 2nd for #3 and Gormley. Watch this **** happen.
I just got a terribly sick feeling. Former Kitchener Ranger and Coyotes darling of his draft year Jeff Skinner is on the table. He fits Maloney's age requirement. Oh. My. God. I could TOTALLY see Maloney doing something stupid, here. Holy ****. What if we trade #3 for Skinner and minor pieces? Ugh. I could see tossing Gormely in just because the Coyotes inexplicably hate him for no reason. Skinner and a 2nd for #3 and Gormley. Watch this **** happen.
Phew. Good point. I remember now. He did say that TOR and CAR are not interested in swapping and he's only going to trade for a center of he trades outright.
Which begs the question; why draft Hanifin or Marner or Provorov? If he'll only trade outright for a center then doesn't that mean he will draft one? He's essentially trading the #3 for Strome who's a center. He's the only one there.