With 28 teams I know the league has set a goal to reach 30 as soon as possible to match the NHL & AHL.
OKC has one of the best teams in the NBA. The people would rather see that than AA hockey.
OKC has one of the best teams in the NBA. The people would rather see that than AA hockey.
How come Worcester isn't at least explored? They averaged 3000+ per game and are vacant since the Sharks sent them back to California.
OKC is a natural imo.
OKC has one of the best teams in the NBA. The people would rather see that than AA hockey.
That's the only pro team in town. We all know about your hatred of the ECHL, but it could succeed in OKC.
OKC has one of the best teams in the NBA. The people would rather see that than AA hockey.
You have to realize certain cities in the country are more into college than pro. You certainly could argue OKC loves its college athletics.
This thread has gotten into the "well how about this place" just because they could doesn't mean they should. League is big enough now. Really need contraction but these days everyone believes that anywhere that could, should have a team.
Contract, why? If a city has the support, good arena, good economic sustainability then why not grow. Doesn't make sense not to. Just because one individual doesn't like a certain number of teams.
There ya go again, prior to the AHL arrival OKC was in the top five of attendance in minor league hockey. The sad part was it was the AHL is the best minor pro attitude that just presumed AHL was going to be a success in OKC. Before at the AA level OKC has nearby rivals, controlled with local loyal ownership, not a destiny controlled by the NHL club. Nothing wrong at all with AA hockey if it is done to the liking of the local fans and maintains a local identity.
There ya go again, prior to the AHL arrival OKC was in the top five of attendance in minor league hockey. The sad part was it was the AHL is the best minor pro attitude that just presumed AHL was going to be a success in OKC. Before at the AA level OKC has nearby rivals, controlled with local loyal ownership, not a destiny controlled by the NHL club. Nothing wrong at all with AA hockey if it is done to the liking of the local fans and maintains a local identity.
AA hockey being what it should be died the day this league decided to get in bed with the affiliate game.
Simple.
No LOCAL ownership group.
Except it seems the other self-proclaimed "AA" leagues are the dead ones. So I question that "affiliations" should, in any way whatsoever, be included in the same sentence with the word "dead" in the meaning you prescribed.
Now maybe the NHL would rather be in the junior hockey business. Then you can pretty much write off the ECHL. But I see no indications of this happening (thing being I'm not so sure it shouldn't happen).