MSSLYNX
Registered User
- Jul 27, 2009
- 4,009
- 917
Well thats a lot of excuses in there.I guess I meant to say bad/dissappointing year compared to where they could be instead of a down year.
Drouin had less points than last year, while playing on the first line... not a good year.
Galchenyuk had an average year by his standards with a large - to go with it, I think he is capable of much more.
Plekanec is terrible as of the last two years, but you knew that.
Lehkonen had a bad year for most of the season assuming young players should be getting better after their first season.
Danault/Shaw being on average p/gp doesnt really help when they miss a large chunk of the season.
Byron - 8 less points is relatively significant when comparing a 43 point player and a 35 point player.
I clearly said in my post forwards, so bringing up Petry and any other D has nothing to do with what I said.
The point I was making was that only Gallagher was able to perform better than he has in the past, why should we only single out Pacioretty, who also had an injury, and not acknowledge the team sucked this year. I know that Pacioretty had a bad year, I'm not saying he didn't, but only one forward improving does say a lot about the team.
Gave you Byron had down year but dont make it look like its a lot: 1 pt every 10 games.
Only one who went really downward is Max
Maybe your expectations for Drouin, Galchenyuk, Lehkonen are too high. First 2 are heavily dependant on power play to get their points, not BG. They produce 0.3 ppg without the power play.
So how come Gallagher was able to improve that much with bad linemates?