featherhawk
Registered User
- Dec 13, 2006
- 14,247
- 4,972
Paying 6.4M for DeBrincat to sit on the 3rd line is ridiculous.3c next to debrincat as a bumslaying line
Kubalik Toews -------
------ Dach Kane
Debrincat Strome ------
gg ez next
Paying 6.4M for DeBrincat to sit on the 3rd line is ridiculous.
People said something similar about kessel, I think it would work well.Paying 6.4M for DeBrincat to sit on the 3rd line is ridiculous.
And Sharp worked well as 5mil something player there too.People said something similar about kessel, I think it would work well.
And Sharp worked well as 5mil something player there too.
When you have a stacked roster and are an elite team. Having a highly priced bum slaying idea is quite poor when you arent loaded or succeeding with your top 2 lines.
Yep. You need the Toews and Kane lines to each be very successful without DeBrincat in order to make sense placing Cat on the third line.
It was that way in 2015 when Sharp was on the third. It was also that way with the Crosby and Malkin lines with back-to-back Pens’ cups.
If you have a really good winger you don’t willingly throw him on the third line when your top two lines aren’t up to snuff.
I just don't know who Cat really fits in with anymore. I used to think that size wasn't such a defining factor but for chemistry and playstyle it affects a lot. Him with Kane makes it easy to play physical strategically against them. I don't believe Dach offsets that enough. Cat with Toews and Kubalik/Suter? I'm not sure if that meshes well. And bigger teams now have two top lines they're facing with wingers under 5'8', where having a big 3rd or 4th/shutdown line could negate a lot of pressure.
Just my opinion, I don't know shit about shit
He's definitely got the feistiness of marchand. My buds and I call him scrappy doo when he jumps in post-whistleI think it’s a good point. In an ideal world, DeBrincat becomes more and more like two-way Marchand as he matures (minus the total douchebag attempts to hurt guys).
but without that evolution/growth, I can’t really think of a great example of a good top-6 with two undersized guys, and where one of those is completely uninvolved in defensive play 95% of the time.
DeBrincat fits literally anywhere with skilled players.... What a silly statement. The kid has elite instinct and an elite shot. If you can't make him work in a lineup, you're an imbecile.
I think there’s more nuance to it. There’s no reason you can’t put him next to skill players on the third line.DeBrincat fits literally anywhere with skilled players.... What a silly statement. The kid has elite instinct and an elite shot. If you can't make him work in a lineup, you're an imbecile.