I mean, it seemed pretty clear to me that he was injured. It turns out he was. As I said, it was all about whether you feel it’s right than anything else.
You realize my entire point the whole time was that he had no proof, so saying things as if they're fact is foolish... right?
He made a blind guess, with no facts to back it up, and acted like he had proof... even suggesting that there was proof available. Then, when asked, he couldn't provide that proof (because he didn't have any).
Saying something "seemed pretty clear" means absolutely nothing when the entire discussion was about having proof/evidence to back up claims.
Again, ... just clarifying since it sounds like you're misunderstanding what I was saying to him.