Pyke*
Guest
That is all. He is, imo, the BPA.
(And someone take Landeskog so we don't 'accidentally' take him.) ....
It's unrealistic to assume that Couturier will go above RNH, so maybe we need to pick no lower than 3rd?
1. Larsson
2. Landeskog
3. RNH
I could see that.
Course, I could also see RNH going #1.
(And someone take Landeskog so we don't 'accidentally' take him.) ....
It's unrealistic to assume that Couturier will go above RNH, so maybe we need to pick no lower than 3rd?
1. Larsson
2. Landeskog
3. RNH
I could see that.
Course, I could also see RNH going #1.