NyQuil
Big F$&*in Q
Do we need to make a "Former Sens Megagthread"?
The Silf thread, now Rundblad?
Also: I don't want him back.
It might actually be a good idea.
Saves the discussion from assimilating other threads.
Do we need to make a "Former Sens Megagthread"?
The Silf thread, now Rundblad?
Also: I don't want him back.
The concerning aspect is that a guy like Connor Murphy, who is younger and drafted two years later in 2011, is now playing regularly for the squad.
It's one thing to wait your turn, it's another to watch guys drafted later on take your spot.
The concerning aspect is that a guy like Connor Murphy, who is younger and drafted two years later in 2011, is now playing regularly for the squad.
It's one thing to wait your turn, it's another to watch guys drafted later on take your spot.
Do we need to make a "Former Sens Megagthread"?
The Silf thread, now Rundblad?
Also: I don't want him back.
That's like saying Ottawa traded Chet Pickard and Taylor Beck to Nashville for Erik Karlsson.
Chet Pickard has played primarily in the ECHL in terms of his professional career.
Taylor Beck has played 18 games in the NHL.
Does that make up for Tarasenko for Rundblad?
The concerning aspect is that a guy like Connor Murphy, who is younger and drafted two years later in 2011, is now playing regularly for the squad.
It's one thing to wait your turn, it's another to watch guys drafted later on take your spot.
Here's a conspiracy theory for you: Tippet knows that he has a potential gem in Rundblad in terms of offense (despite what his stats line says). Furthermore, when on the ice this year he has shown that his defense has improved to the level of a decent/good 3rd pair defenseman. At the same time Tippet also knows that he has options right now which are marginally 'worse, equal or better' defensively and he doesn't really more offense than what is provided but Yandle and OEL. He also knows that even if Rundblad has what it takes right now he will still need about 30 games to really become comfortable in being a NHL regular. Right now he is giving Rundblad just enough time to keep him from going nuts and come the trade deadline he will try to move Yandle if PHX are not in the playoffs. If they are in the playoffs I think that he could still try to move a couple of pieces from his defense for help up front seeing as he has enough depth in his d-core to be comfortable.
In the end I think that next season will be the decisive one for Rundblad's career. I doubt he will accept another season like this one so Tippet will either have to play him or let him go.
Good thread
Has only played 11 games this year despite being on the main roster all season.
This trade keeps getting better and better for Ottawa and their acquisition of Kyle Turris.
BTW, we can use this thread to keep tabs on whether Rundblad suits up for the Coyotes.
Well, Phoenix's defensive depth certainly isn't helping, but if he were playing a lot of minutes on a team without depth, you might see a Justin Schultz type situation where he's a -33 in two seasons.
I'm not sure if that's good for player development either.
Ideally he'd be in a bottom-pairing, PP situation on a team that plays an up-tempo puck possession style based on skating and offense.
Maybe they should trade him to the Leafs.
I think it's also a huge testament to the ottawa organisation, to our player development, etc. I.e. if Rundblad were here he'd be better than he is in Phoenix right now and if Turris weren't here he'd be worse than he is here right now.
Ekman-Larsson, Yandle & co. >>> Rundblad. He's a depth piece for them.
Turris >>> most of our centres.
It's not so much a steal for us as we have an appalling lack of depth of high-end centres and we have very good depth at "D". The fact that Turris is our #1C is great but...we're still not there.
You mean like Patrick Wiercoch and Cody Ceci....?
I had no idea who Rundblad was at first. Then we acquired him and I was really high on him. Then I started to have my doubts about why St. Louis gave him up, and I was pretty low on him. But then he seemed dominant in a league I never watch, so I was high on him again. Then he struggled with us and I was pretty low on him for awhile. Then I was starting to get high on him again. But then we traded him and since then, I've been low on him.
I had no idea who Rundblad was at first. Then we acquired him and I was really high on him. Then I started to have my doubts about why St. Louis gave him up, and I was pretty low on him. But then he seemed dominant in a league I never watch, so I was high on him again. Then he struggled with us and I was pretty low on him for awhile. Then I was starting to get high on him again. But then we traded him and since then, I've been low on him.