krutovsdonut
eeyore
- Sep 25, 2016
- 16,900
- 9,575
Stat's don't bore out what you want them to and don't jive with your feels! Let's just change the argument!
You said scoring 50 pts as a rookie isn't a big deal. Now are you saying we need to drop it to sub 40 pts? You just keep reinforcing that you have no idea what you are talking about.
so many straw men.
1. i didn't ever say 50 pts as a rookie is not a big deal. i implied that it is not necessarily an indicator of future success by citing three 50 pt rookies who did not go on to bigger and better point totals. there are two specific posts now explaining this very clearly. do you have trouble with reading comprehension?
2. i didn't say we need to drop anything to 40 points. i said that if you are going to claim nathan mackinnon is in the same cohort as keith tkachuk (which i disagree with) then that cohort also includes any player who is the same distance behind keith tkachuk's rookie ppg average as tkachuk is behind mackinnon on ppg.
in future you should read carefully before you type. you seem to keep tripping over yourself.