I don't think Virtanen will be with the Canucks next season. I think he will need a full year with Utica next season. I don't know if Benning will sign Burrows to a short term contract. But I can see a similar roster next season and Boeser will probably be with Utica.
Boeser? Really? What "budding star" has Benning given AHL time? They don't rush the kids. They simply "accelerate" them. If you can explain the difference please do. The two he wasn't going to accelerate made it there anyways, Hutton and Stecher. I look for similar behavior with Boeser.
It's not so much a testament to how good the kids are, but to how bad the team actually is that they are able to play better than what's there. They were going with Bartkowski and Weber, but Hutton and even Biega were better. This year it was Larsen and Gudbranson and turns out Stecher is better. Now they are playing Megna and Chaput rather than pick up better through the waiver wire. Hutton, Cracknell, Stecher, Chaput and Megna were all slated for Utica and shocked them into being better than Benning realized or as Benning thinks are better than what's available in the cases of Chaput and Megna, which I don't buy and neither do most of this Board.
Then in the cases of Virtanen and McCann instead of sending them back to Jrs. and then starting them in the AHL this season, they were "accelerated" and proved not to be ready. Results? He dumped Jarred in a trade before the kid had any real chance of developing and Jake is struggling to even keep his head above water in the AHL.
He's essentially rushed 2 first rounders and traded a third without giving him any chance to prove himself when he was just starting to break out at the AHL level. The ones playing in Vancouver are all older than the 1st round prospects after playing in the NCAA. People forget this when seeing them perform successfully. Bo succeeded in spite of them. Just in these cases alone for those who feel he is a genius in talent evaluation, I'm not seeing it. We won't even go into all the trade blunders.