YNWA14
Onbreekbaar
- Dec 29, 2010
- 34,543
- 2,560
They didn't.Because they missed two sitters?
Also Liverpool have, again, had more chances. Pickford saving them or something (but that doesn't count).
They didn't.Because they missed two sitters?
Everton has certainly had the better chances. I don’t even know if I’d say Liverpool has had more, but Everton certainly has had the better chances.Liverpool have had more chances to score. Why should Everton be ahead?
Also since when does a keeper playing well mean the other team should have scored?
Howso? Shaqiri's chance was the best chance of the game.Everton has certainly had the better chances. I don’t even know if I’d say Liverpool has had more, but Everton certainly has had the better chances.
The header was the best chance of the game. Then walcott’s. Then shaqiri. Allison stopped both well. So did Pickford. Best chances are still everton’s imoHowso? Shaqiri's chance was the best chance of the game.
Everton has had a header which Allison made a great play to come out, get right in front of, and make himself as big as possible. Everton hasn't missed any chances Liverpool have defended them.
Walcott didn't even get a shot? Shaqiri's chance was certainly better than Gomes' header. Headers in that space are incredibly difficult to control and Allison didn't give him anywhere to place it. Would have needed to be a perfect header to score and it was defended well. Certainly if Allison hadn't come out as quickly as he did it would have been a golden opportunity. It was a great defensive play (and he did well to come out on Walcott as well).The header was the best chance of the game. Then walcott’s. Then shaqiri. Allison stopped both well. So did Pickford. Best chances are still everton’s imo
Yeah pretty much.The header was the best chance of the game. Then walcott’s. Then shaqiri. Allison stopped both well. So did Pickford. Best chances are still everton’s imo
Only you would think a free header from four yards out in the middle of the net is a worse chance than a shot from eight yards out and at an angle. Only you would think a ball cleared off the line is a worse chance than an easy save.Walcott didn't even get a shot? Shaqiri's chance was certainly better than Gomes' header. Headers in that space are incredibly difficult to control and Allison didn't give him anywhere to place it. Would have needed to be a perfect header to score and it was defended well. Certainly if Allison hadn't come out as quickly as he did it would have been a golden opportunity. It was a great defensive play (and he did well to come out on Walcott as well).
Shaqiri was alone, and had only the keeper to beat.
....Shaqiri's chance was certainly better than Gomes' header.
Yeah I understand that argument. I think they’re about equal, but certainly the header is, well, ahead.I’d say the Shaqiri chance is better than then Wolcott one since he had less pressure on him, but the header is clearly a superior chance to both.
"Only you" would think that someone getting the ball hit off their legs and then having it go out of play equates to beating the keeper.Only you would think a free header from four yards out in the middle of the net is a worse chance than a shot from eight yards out and at an angle. Only you would think a ball cleared off the line is a worse chance than an easy save.
Both Shaqiri and Walcott were in alone with just the goalie to beat. Walcott passed the goalie but took too large of a touch after Allison intervened. Shaqiri never got around the goalie but took a shot that was easily saved by Pickford. The chances are very similar but I posit that Walcott’s was better because he actually got around Allison, albeit with a forced large touch.
Even after the ball hit off his legs, he took another touch. Again. It was a forced bad touch. Like I said. Nor did I ever say he beat the keeper. Just got around him."Only you" would think that someone getting the ball hit off their legs and then having it go out of play equates to beating the keeper.
Even on replay it seemed naturalI’d like to see a better replay, but live I didn’t think he had anywhere else to put his arm so that wasn’t a handball.