Phoenix XXIII - Bond: The Phoenix Project

Discussion in 'Fugu's Business of Hockey Forum' started by Fugu, Feb 28, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
View Users: View Users
  1. Fugu

    Fugu Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Messages:
    36,952
    Likes Received:
    211
    Trophy Points:
    1,000
    Occupation:
    Existence
    Location:
    ϶(°o°)ϵ
  2. MAROONSRoad

    MAROONSRoad f/k/a Ghost

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    4,067
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Maroons Rd.
    I do not like the way pro sports leagues take advantage of cities -- playing one against the other -- and try to extort public funding for what is essentially private business. The proposed Coyotes deal is one of the most ridiculous examples of corporate welfare subsidies for a professional sports franchise. Massive public subsidies also skew the free market allowing teams to exist in markets where there is not sufficient demand. So, yes, while it would be nice to see the Coyotes move back to Canada, I find those other aspects interesting as well.

    GHOST
     
  3. goyotes

    goyotes Registered User

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Arizona
    Let me ask you, after the thousands of recent posts, and the hundreds of pages of documents we have all reviewed in our spare time, do you really believe that the GWI lacks the information necessary to determine whether this transaction is unconstitutional? I found that exceptionally diffficult to believe personally. I also am of the opinion that the GWI is doing what they can to kill this deal because they don't like it from a policy standpoint. If it was unconstitutional, the GWI would be in court today seeking an injuction to stop the City from selling bonds to secure the sale of the team. Because, it is only their action at this point that is the only chance there is to prevent this from closing.

    So far, on this issue, the GWI has proven itself to be a paper tiger.
     
  4. davemac1313

    davemac1313 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2011
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Pays the Bills
    Location:
    Keewatin, Ontario
    Not sure they need an injunction to stop the bond sale...seems to have already happened
     
  5. goyotes

    goyotes Registered User

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Arizona
    Because when someone asks you if "you wanna go" you drop your gloves and get the first punch in. That is why I would go after the GWI, even if I couldn't collect on the judgment.
     
  6. cbcwpg

    cbcwpg Registered User

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,969
    Likes Received:
    1,884
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Between the Pipes
    So the question is:

    In the eyes of the law, can the GWI legally sue an entity over a business transaction that has not yet been completed?
     
  7. goyotes

    goyotes Registered User

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Arizona
    Davemac1313 - The bonds will sell. The interest rate will be higher than necessary. The deal will close unless the GWI can somehow get a court to injoin the sale. What the GWI is doing is playing chicken, and for their part, they are not protecting the taxpayer. They are just driving up the cost of the bond.
     
  8. David_99

    David_99 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,914
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Graphic Artist
    Location:
    Moncton, NB
    Where's the other $97 mil coming from?
     
  9. Jesus Christ Horburn

    Jesus Christ Horburn Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2008
    Messages:
    13,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    McCown was talking to Sunnucks on The Fan 590.

    According to McCown's sources, the interest rate is 8%. Sunnucks thinks it will be between 8-9%.

    Both agree that there is a deadline within a matter of days.
     
  10. CBJ goalie

    CBJ goalie Registered User

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,373
    Likes Received:
    312
    Trophy Points:
    124
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London, Ontario
    You have got to be kidding.

    The GWI is playing games? The only 'game' they are playing is the one the COG started, when they continuely denied and re-buffed their requests for documentation.
    Tell us, what has GWI done to initiate ANY delays in this whole process?

    They've been asking for info the whole time - they're not the ones making it up as they go.
     
  11. AllByDesign

    AllByDesign Who's this ABD guy??

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    2,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Finance.
    Location:
    Location, Location!
    I must admit, I am getting a dizzy feeling in the ole noggeroony with the amount of times I see this being stated.

    I had posted previously, but I think it went out with the bathwater, so I will re-submit my question...

    Since GW started sniff around this deal, it had not only been the thought of our esteemed posters from HFBoards, but from people within the COG that had such opinions of the GWI

    Sabre-rattlers
    PR Croneys
    Nussances that have no actual teeth
    Too pre-occupied with Obama care to have any real opinion on the Coyotes
    etc, etc.

    Now in the last week we have the NHL/MH/COG united statements that the GWI is of concern, and could potentially de-rail the deal. Why now? Thoughts?


    Congrats :handclap: Better results than TSN's Tradecentre ;)
     
  12. OthmarAmmann

    OthmarAmmann Omnishambles

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    54
    Location:
    NYC
    I suppose you could say it was set at 6.8%. It might be better to say that's their asking price. I don't think the best case is a whole lot lower than that, but it could be.

    The comments from MH seem to indicate that 6.8% is already a bit too high, but that he thinks the bonds are probably going to go for more than that based on the current market (based on the Illinois issue I have a tough time believing it could a lot lower than 6.8% but perhaps there could be some room). In order for the difference to be $100 million though the difference between the [GWI does not sue] interest rate and the [GWI does sue] interest rate is somewhere around 4% or more. I just picked 5% as a base and figured out what it would have to be to get to the additional $100 million.

    To increase the interest cost of $173 million that's shown in the bond offering by $100 million, the interest rate would have to go from 6.8% to around 11%.

    As I mentioned, each bond will have a different interest rate depending on when it matures. Every interest rate above is really just an average interest rate.

    The city could also save significant interest costs by paying down the debt earlier. This reduces the principal outstanding upon which the interest is determined and also would decrease the interest rate on the debt. They could easily save $40 million just on having less debt outstanding. If that also reduced the average interest rate by 0.5% they could save over $60 million. Not to sound inflammatory, but their bond offering resembles some of the higher risk mortgages that were underwritten a few years ago.
     
  13. davemac1313

    davemac1313 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2011
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Pays the Bills
    Location:
    Keewatin, Ontario
    They haven't sold as yet, despite many assurances they would be offered previously. Do you think that COG could be leery of the increased cost due to a higher rate and is hesitant to commit? They have to see the higher rate makes this tougher for them to show they get more than they give? Yes?
     
  14. NHLfan4life

    NHLfan4life Who is PKP???

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Glendale
    I don't think anyone thought otherwise. I think everyone is on the defense here so if you are being attacked or feeling so, so be it. It really doesn't matter in the scheme of things either way.

    I do feel this will all be wrapped up this week. :help:
     
  15. RAgIn

    RAgIn Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Sudbury, Ont
    I highly doubt that. GWI's motivation/obligation is to try to get the best possible deal for Glendale and its taxpayers. Litigation might be a way for them achieve this goal. We'll see.

    Obviously, the way this deal has been manufactured isn't ideal. In fact, it doesn't look good at all. Im just happy I'm not a Glendale taxpayer. However, there is no other suitable owner that can be found. Hasn't been for over 3 plus years. Its apparent that its Hulsizer's ****** deal or relocation. If Hulsizer truly really believed in the Phoenix/Glendale market, he could've payed the whole thing himself (group) up-front. But obviously, he needs subsidies and cash up-front to accept this deal. It sad, really.
     
  16. Tommy Hawk

    Tommy Hawk Registered User

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,090
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    96
    According to one report, JPM was putting the bonds out for subscription, which is different than offering. Subscription is to gauge interest in the bonds. IF it is taking this long, must not be a lot of interest in the bonds.
     
  17. goyotes

    goyotes Registered User

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Arizona
    And the answer is .... yes. Without a doubt, if the sale would be illegal and/or unconstitutional .... yes. In fact, suit should be brought before the harm, illegal activity/unconstitutional transaction occurrs.
     
  18. vivianmb

    vivianmb Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,891
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    winnipeg
    Home Page:
    upshall traded to columbus. coincidence?
     
  19. Dado

    Dado Guest

    Yeah, my math came up with similiar same rate. Seems either MH is trying to blow smoke up our *** about the "extra $100M", or its true and the offering came in DOA.
     
  20. AllByDesign

    AllByDesign Who's this ABD guy??

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    2,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Finance.
    Location:
    Location, Location!
    An interesting analogy coming from someone who practices law. I've generally found lawyers tempering their options and choosing the path of least resistance in acheiving their end results.

    If I took your analogy in fighting Derek Boogard I would get one punch in... of course I would have my room pre-booked in intensive care.

    The JPM offering did state that there was a minimum pre-order in order to determine full release of the bonds. There are so many mixed messages that it is difficult to determine if the bonds won't or can't be issued. Depends on who you ask I suppose.
     
  21. ATHF

    ATHF 行くジェット移動 !!

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2010
    Messages:
    875
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    51
    It's become fairly clear that the COG actually selling the bonds is a bit of a hail mary as investors are staying away for a variety of reasons. I think the more interesting factor is that rather than the COG just admitting that their end around didn't work and that their deal won't work as is, they're trying to pass the buck to blame the GWI as if the GWI is the only reason why people don't want to buy. The interest rate and the reports from all of the reputable sources of bond information like Moody's go hand in hand.

    If anything, GWI will probably end up saving the COG some money as they won't have to pay back nearly half a billion dollars in interest and principle. In fact, if the bonds sell at 9%, it will actually cost the COG more than their "worst case scenario" of the arena getting boarded up while they move the entire COG five miles down the road.
     
  22. goyotes

    goyotes Registered User

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Arizona
    I think the council authorized a sale of the bonds and the City ordinance allows up to 9%. I'm sure the CoG will try and get the best rate they can, which is why there is so much out there now about the GWI needing to back off. As to the higher interest rate going to a gift, I don't think the GWI can make that claim given they would be at least one of the greatest factors in why the bonds sold at a higher rate. I'm sure the CoG would bring in experts that the GWI would have a hard time rebutting that would testify that the cloud of the GWI's litigation threat was the factor in raising the interest rate.

    Having said that, I'm not completely sure that a court will not take into consideration the interest rate when looking at whether what the City was paying was grossly disproportionate the what direct benefits it was receiving.
     
  23. Brodie

    Brodie Marxist-Harbaughist

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2009
    Messages:
    15,096
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Michigan
    hahaha really? TNSE is controlling the team :laugh:
     
  24. goyotes

    goyotes Registered User

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,811
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Arizona
    As a litigator, you learn when to fight and when not to. This would certainly be one of those scorched earth campaigns.

    The GWI is not Derek Boogard. The CoG has the real heavy weight firms on its side as bond counsel and counsel rendering an opinion on the legality of the transaction. I would put the Snell and Fennemore lawyers up against the GWI any day. That would really be Boogard punching my lights out.

    Everyone needs to realize the GWI in not the ACLU. They're not a bunch of dummies, but they really are being viewed more as a problem or obstacle than a formidable foe.
     
  25. Acesolid

    Acesolid The Illusive Bettman

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,392
    Likes Received:
    112
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    Québec
    [​IMG]

    In March 2011
    an entire city council disappeared
    in the town of Glendale, Arizona
    while trying to save a hockey team......

    A year later their footage was found in Winnipeg.


    Bond: the Phoenix Project
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"