HockeyAnalysis
Registered User
I don't believe any of this is true.
I believe documents submitted by the Balsillie camp (don't remember which particular party) put the relocation fees around $250 million, and the $212.5 million figure assumes minimal to no damages to Glendale (again working from memory, but I think it assumed three years of damages at a very low per-year figure, an the judge has already said is invalid).
I am pretty sure that is not true. The Balsillie camp has gone out of their way to not indicate what they might be willing to pay or what they think is a reasonable contract. See tonights Prime Time Sports interview as an example. The judge himself has ruled that the the league is entitled to the difference in expansion fees that the NHL would get from a Hamilton franchise and from a Phoenix franchise as per the Raiders II decision. Rodier postulated tonight that if the NHL's own relocation fees were used the number might in fact be lower.