ahmedou
DOU
- Oct 7, 2017
- 19,244
- 18,632
No not 2nd C edition. He’s a 3c.
Crazy that the Danault line is one of the best in the NHL at the moment
Crazy that the Danault line is one of the best in the NHL at the moment
Crazy that the Danault line is one of the best in the NHL at the moment
Maybe he's our David Legwand, but Legwand broke 60 once.He is this era’s version of Tomas Plekanec minus the 2nd line offensive skills
At bestNo not 2nd C edition. He’s a 3c.
On the Top 10 reasons why we are sucking so bad Danault's name is nowhere to be found
No **** he's not a legit Top 6 C but we have nobody else at the moment who can play Top 6, not his fault, same as Plekanec before him
Its nothing like the coddling DD got when there were better options, PD is doing all the heavy lifting up the middle, 100% opposite of DD
KK playing 3rd C and PP is a perfect situation for the rookie, just need to get some healthy bodies and get his better line mates back
He was definitely better than Danault but given the ice time and line mates Pleks had those last fews years he was probably on the bottom end pts wise of where a contending team needs the 2C to be but he was having to fill 1C due to lack of options - especially anyone you could trust to play a 200 ft game which is where Danault is having to fill in nowPlekanec was a legitimate second-line centre, for the approximate period 2008-2015. He had a good run.
fact ? seriously ? no mention of McKinnon/Rantaanen in the article... are you too thinking Habs line is better than the Avs line ? seriously ? that's what you consider a fact ? Habs line is so f***ing far ahead McKinnon/Rantaanen are not even mentionned in the "article"...What......wait, must be a mistake , it cant be
God....i just hate when facts get in the way of my fellows HF posters thinking
Phil is a very good Hockey player, can step up in a 2C role when needed and doing so very well right now, eventually i see him in the 3C spot whenever CJ feel that KK is ready for bigger responsabilities
Are you actually mocking those of us that feel that way about Phil Danault?What......wait, must be a mistake , it cant be
God....i just hate when facts get in the way of my fellows HF posters thinking
Phil is a very good Hockey player, can step up in a 2C role when needed and doing so very well right now, eventually i see him in the 3C spot whenever CJ feel that KK is ready for bigger responsabilities
and you're making a post, trying to mock people who disagree with the dumb article ?
Are you actually mocking those of us that feel that way about Phil Danault?
Not at all but you basically quoted what I had said about Danault a few days earlier and phrased it as if you were quoting me in a mocking manner. If I misunderstood that then I apologise.Wow, you guy's are very sensitive
lol so if he doesn't have the offensive skills, then how is he like Pleks? Just because he plays defence?He is this era’s version of Tomas Plekanec minus the 2nd line offensive skills
The type of comment you made we see too often and its dumb as hell, Theres nothing funny about it. Maybe the first few thousand Times. Dont worry though Takes more than that to shake me.Not true, how can i mock someone for disagreeing with an article that i didnt even read
Just a joke maybe not the best one but still only a joke
Dont get so riled up, take a deep breath, everything is fine Habs lost yesterday you should be a happy men now